Family ownership and R&D investment: the moderating role of banks and private equity

被引:25
|
作者
Cirillo, Alessandro [1 ]
Ossorio, Mario [2 ]
Pennacchio, Luca [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Econ, Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Econ, Capua, Italy
[3] Univ Napoli Parthenope, Dept Business & Econ, Naples, Italy
关键词
Family ownership; R&D intensity; Socio-emotional wealth; Bank backing; Private equity backing; MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; BEHAVIORAL AGENCY; INNOVATION; FIRMS; IMPACT; INVOLVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/MD-07-2016-0454
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to innovation and family business literature by establishing whether institutional involvement of private equity (PE) and banks in family firms moderates the relationship between family ownership and research and development (R&D) investment. Design/methodology/approach This paper used the socio-emotional wealth lens to carry out an econometric analysis on a large sample of Italian non-listed family firms. Using the sample selection model meant it was possible to account for potential selection bias arising from firms' discretionary disclosure of R&D expenditure. Findings Family involvement in ownership reduced firms' R&D intensity. When PE investors also held shares, the negative relationship was diverted. Bank involvement, however, did not have a significant effect on the relationship. Originality/value Contradicting the assumption that institutional owners all share the same perspective, this study is the first to assess the impact of different institutional shareholders on R&D intensity of private family firms.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1694
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Moderating Effect of Equity Incentive on Slack and R & D Investment
    Liu, Mingzhu
    Ye, ShuJun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (ICHSSR 2017), 2017, 121 : 441 - 444
  • [22] Do Government Incentives to Promote R&D Increase Private R&D Investment?
    Choi, Jieun
    [J]. WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2022, 37 (02): : 204 - 228
  • [23] PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Becker, Bettina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) : 917 - 942
  • [24] R&D investment and future firm performance: The role of managerial overconfidence and government ownership
    Tebourbi, Imen
    Ting, Irene Wei Kiong
    Le, Hanh Thi My
    Kweh, Qian Long
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2020, 41 (07) : 1269 - 1281
  • [25] Ownership structure and R&D investment: the role of identity and contestability in Spanish listed firms
    Garcia-Garcia, Laura
    Gonzalo Alonso-Buenaposada, Macarena
    Elena Romero-Merino, M.
    Santamaria-Mariscal, Marcos
    [J]. ACADEMIA-REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE ADMINISTRACION, 2020, 33 (3/4): : 405 - 426
  • [26] Technical Knowledge Base and R&D Investment Leap: The Moderating Role of Environment Shock
    Ma, Haiyan
    Li, Yujie
    Chen, Ying
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (03): : 3325 - 3335
  • [27] R&D investment, business performance, and moderating role of Guanxi: Evidence from China
    Guo, Chiquan
    Sarkar, Sudipto
    Zhu, Jing
    Wang, Yong J.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 91 : 55 - 63
  • [28] Does institutional ownership discourage investment in corporate R&D?
    Mishra, Chandra S.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182
  • [29] Venture capital, Ownership concentration and Enterprise R&D investment
    Wen, Hongxing
    Xia, Kui
    [J]. PROMOTING BUSINESS ANALYTICS AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT (ITQM 2016), 2016, 91 : 519 - 525
  • [30] Does institutional ownership discourage investment in corporate R&D?
    Mishra, Chandra S.
    [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 182