An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:111
|
作者
Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Blaschke, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Salzburg Univ, Dept Geoinformat Z GIS, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Univ Tabriz, Ctr Remote Sensing, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Tabriz, GIS, Tabriz, Iran
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
landslide susceptibility mapping; GIS-MCDA; Monte Carlo simulation; sensitivity analysis; Dempster-Shafer Theory; Urmia lake basin; DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; URMIA LAKE BASIN; DECISION-ANALYSIS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SITE SELECTION; FUZZY-LOGIC; SUPPORT; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1080/13658816.2013.869821
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are increasingly being used in landslide susceptibility mapping. However, the uncertainties that are associated with MCDA techniques may significantly impact the results. This may sometimes lead to inaccurate outcomes and undesirable consequences. This article introduces a new GIS-based MCDA approach. We illustrate the consequences of applying different MCDA methods within a decision-making process through uncertainty analysis. Three GIS-MCDA methods in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and Dempster-Shafer theory are analyzed for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in the Urmia lake basin in Iran, which is highly susceptible to landslide hazards. The methodology comprises three stages. First, the LSM criteria are ranked and a sensitivity analysis is implemented to simulate error propagation based on the MCS. The resulting weights are expressed through probability density functions. Accordingly, within the second stage, three MCDA methods, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and ordered weighted average (OWA), are used to produce the landslide susceptibility maps. In the third stage, accuracy assessments are carried out and the uncertainties of the different results are measured. We compare the accuracies of the three MCDA methods based on (1) the Dempster-Shafer theory and (2) a validation of the results using an inventory of known landslides and their respective coverage based on object-based image analysis of IRS-ID satellite images. The results of this study reveal that through the integration of GIS and MCDA models, it is possible to identify strategies for choosing an appropriate method for LSM. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the integration of MCDA and MCS can significantly improve the accuracy of the results. In LSM, the AHP method performed best, while the OWA reveals better performance in the reliability assessment. The WLC operation yielded poor results.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 638
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation—with a case study in the Himalayas
    Ashis K. Saha
    Ravi P. Gupta
    Irene Sarkar
    Manoj K. Arora
    Elmar Csaplovics
    [J]. Landslides, 2005, 2 : 61 - 69
  • [42] An innovative, fast method for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based LSAT toolbox
    Ali Polat
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80
  • [43] GIS-based assessment of landslide susceptibility and inventory mapping using difeferent bivariate models
    Akter, Sonia
    Javed, Syed Aaqib
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (26) : 12913 - 12942
  • [44] A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar
    Roodposhti, Majid Shadman
    Jankowski, Piotr
    Blaschke, Thomas
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 73 : 208 - 221
  • [45] Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Bakhtiar Feizizadeh
    Majid Shadman Roodposhti
    Thomas Blaschke
    Jagannath Aryal
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10
  • [46] An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation - with a case study in the Himalayas
    Saha, AK
    Gupta, RP
    Sarkar, I
    Arora, MK
    Csaplovics, E
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2005, 2 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [47] GIS Based Spatial Data Analysis for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    S.Sarkar Scientist
    D.P.Kanungo
    A.K.Patra
    Pushpendra Kumar
    [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008, (01) : 52 - 62
  • [48] GiS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Sarkar, S.
    Kanungo, D. P.
    Patra, A. K.
    Kumar, Pushpendra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2008, 5 (01) : 52 - 62
  • [49] GIS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping
    S. Sarkar
    D. P. Kanungo
    A. K. Patra
    Pushpendra Kumar
    [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008, 5 : 52 - 62
  • [50] Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar
    Roodposhti, Majid Shadman
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Aryal, Jagannath
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (05)