OBESITY, BODT FAT DISTRIBUTION AND MENARCHEAL AGE AMONG ADOLESCENT GIRLS

被引：0
|
作者：
Shakeri, Mohammad T. [1 ]
Safarian, M. [1 ]
Rouhani, M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] MUMS, Mashhad, Iran
来源：
ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM | 2009年 / 55卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：149 / 149
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MENARCHEAL AGE IN STOCKHOLM GIRLS, 1967
    FURU, M
    ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1976, 3 (06) : 587 - 590
  • [22] Interactive effects of menarcheal status and dating on dieting and disordered eating among adolescent girls
    Cauffman, E
    Steinberg, L
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 32 (04) : 631 - 635
  • [23] MENARCHEAL AGE IN GIRLS WITH CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF HIP
    FREDENSBORG, N
    NILSSON, BE
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 66 (02): : 241 - 242
  • [24] CIDEA expression in SAT from adolescent girls with obesity and unfavorable patterns of abdominal fat distribution
    Tarabra, Elena
    Nouws, Jessica
    Vash-Margita, Alla
    Hellerstein, Marc
    Shabanova, Veronika
    McCollum, Sarah
    Pierpont, Bridget
    Zhao, Dejian
    Shulman, Gerald I.
    Caprio, Sonia
    OBESITY, 2021, 29 (12) : 2068 - 2080
  • [25] INFLUENCES ON MENARCHEAL AGE IN GIRLS IN A WELSH COLLEGE
    ROBERTS, DF
    DANN, TC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE & SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1967, 21 (04): : 170 - &
  • [26] MENARCHEAL AGE IN EAST-GERMAN GIRLS
    PELZ, L
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 1992, 81 (11) : 946 - 947
  • [27] A SHORT NOTE ON THE MENARCHEAL AGE OF ASSAMESE GIRLS
    RAKSHIT, S
    MAN IN INDIA, 1960, 40 (01) : 52 - 55
  • [28] The effect of socio-economic status and dietary factors on the growth and menarcheal age of adolescent girls
    Durrani, Anisa M.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2007, 51 : 188 - 188
  • [29] Birth weight and body fat distribution in adolescent girls
    Barker, M
    Robinson, S
    Osmond, C
    Barker, DJP
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1997, 77 (05) : 381 - 383
  • [30] Subjective age biases among adolescent girls
    Guiot, D
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 27, 2000, 27 : 215 - 223
12345