Changes in electrical dyssynchrony by body surface mapping predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:38
|
作者
Gage, Ryan M. [1 ]
Curtin, Antonia E. [2 ]
Burns, Kevin V. [1 ]
Ghosh, Subham [3 ]
Gillberg, Jeffrey M. [3 ]
Bank, Alan J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] United Heart & Vasc Clin, 225 N Smith Ave,Suite 400, St Paul, MN 55102 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Medtron Plc, Mounds View, MN USA
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Response; Electrocardiography; Body surface mapping; CLINICAL EVENT REDUCTION; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; QRS DURATION; CARDIOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; SELECTION; WAVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Electrical activation is important in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. Standard electrocardiographic analysis may not accurately reflect the heterogeneity of electrical activation. OBJECTIVE We compared changes in left ventricular size and function after CRT to native electrical dyssynchrony and its change during pacing. METHODS Body surface isochronal maps using 53 anterior and posterior electrodes as well as 12-lead electrocardiograms were acquired after CRT in 66 consecutive patients. Electrical dyssynchrony was quantified using standard deviation of activation times (SDAT). Ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were measured before CRT and at 6 months. Multiple regression evaluated predictors of response. RESULTS ALVESV correlated with ASDAT (P = .007), but not with AQRS duration (P = .092). Patients with SDAT >35 ms had greater increase in EF (13 8 units vs 4 9 units; P < .001) and LVESV (-34% 28 /0 vs 13 /0 29 /0; P = .005). Patients with >10% improvement in SDAT had greater AEF (11 9 units vs 4 9 units; P = .010) and ALVESV (-33% 26% vs 6% 34%; P = .001). SDAT >35 ms predicted AEF, while ASDAT, sex, and left bundle branch block predicted ALVESV. In 34 patients without class I indication for CRT, SDAT >35 ms (P = .015) and ASDAT >10% (P = .032) were the only predictors of AEF. CONCLUSION Body surface mapping of SDAT and its changes predicted CRT response better than did QRS duration. Body surface mapping may potentially improve selection or optimization of CRT patients.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 399
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A radial global dyssynchrony index as predictor of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ascione, Luigi
    Iengo, Raffaele
    Accadia, Maria
    Rumolo, Salvatore
    Celentano, Eduardo
    D'Andrea, Antonello
    De Michele, Mario
    Muto, Carmine
    Carreras, Giovanni
    Maglione, Marco
    Tuccillo, Bernardino
    Roelandt, Jos
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (07): : 819 - 827
  • [22] Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bleeker, GB
    Bax, JJ
    Molhoek, SG
    Holman, ER
    Steendijk, P
    van der Wall, EE
    Schalij, MJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 160A - 160A
  • [23] Wasted septal work in left ventricular dyssynchrony: a novel principle to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Vecera, J.
    Penicka, M.
    Eriksen, M.
    Russell, K.
    Bartunek, J.
    Vanderheyden, M.
    Smiseth, O. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 17 (06) : 624 - 632
  • [24] Ventricular electrical activation in cardiac resynchronization as characterized by body surface potential mapping
    Pastore, Carlos Alberto
    Tobias, Nancy
    Samesima, Nelson
    Martinelli Filho, Martino
    Pedrosa, Anisio
    Nishioka, Silvana
    Douglas, Roberto A.
    Pinho Moreira, Luiz Felipe
    Ramires, Jose Franchini
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2007, 88 (03) : 251 - 257
  • [25] Effect of stimulation frequency on left ventricular mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Naar, J.
    Prinzen, F.
    Volf, P.
    Doskar, P.
    Lumens, J.
    Heckman, L.
    Prokopova, M.
    Braunschweig, F.
    Neuzil, P.
    Stahlberg, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 65 - 66
  • [26] Analysis of Ventricular Activation Using Surface Electrocardiography to Predict Left Ventricular Reverse Volumetric Remodeling During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Sweeney, Michael O.
    van Bommel, Rutger J.
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Borleffs, C. Jan Willem
    Hellkamp, Anne S.
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 121 (05) : 626 - 634
  • [27] Effect of Right Ventricular Pacing Lead on Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Sade, Leyla Elif
    Demir, Ozlem
    Atar, Ilyas
    Muderrisoglu, Haldun
    Ozin, Bulent
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 103 (05): : 695 - 700
  • [28] Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Electrical Remodeling in Patients With Heart Failure
    Zhang, Jianghua
    Xing, Qiang
    Zhou, Xianhui
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Yaodong
    Li, Jinxin
    Tang, Baopeng
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (05) : 495 - 499
  • [29] Interaction of Left Ventricular Remodeling and Regional Dyssynchrony on Long-Term Prognosis after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Tayal, Bhupendar
    Sogaard, Peter
    Delgado-Montero, Antonia
    Goda, Akiko
    Saba, Samir
    Risum, Niels
    Gorcsan, John, III
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2017, 30 (03) : 244 - 250
  • [30] Selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: electrical or mechanical dyssynchrony?
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    MacDonald, Michael R.
    Hogg, Kerry J.
    McMurray, John J. V.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) : 1270 - 1281