Hydropower Royalties: A Comparative Analysis of Major Producing Countries (China, Brazil, Canada and the United States)

被引:16
|
作者
Pineau, Pierre-Olivier [1 ]
Tranchecoste, Lucile [2 ]
Vega-Cardenas, Yenny [3 ]
机构
[1] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Law, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Law, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J7, Canada
关键词
hydropower; royalty; China; Brazil; Canada; United States;
D O I
10.3390/w9040287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydropower is the leading renewable source of electricity generation and a low emission energy source. In order to be developed sustainably, it is important that its costs and benefits are adequately set and distributed. Different mechanisms, such as royalties, can be used for this purpose. Governments have usually kept hydropower royalty rates low, without internalizing negative externalities. This strategy is inefficient because it leads to larger electricity production and consumption, and hence exacerbates environmental impacts. This paper reviews the criteria proposed and used to set hydropower royalties. It also compares practices of the four main hydropower producers in the world: China, Brazil, Canada and the United States. Results show that royalty rates and distribution policies are determined in an arbitrary and unsystematic manner, but also that water use is usually undervalued. In order to encourage the development of this key renewable resource, in a sustainable and responsible way, national and international efforts should be made to rationalize and harmonize hydropower royalty rates.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative analysis of cancer statistics in China and the United States in 2024
    Wu, Yujie
    He, Siyi
    Cao, Mengdi
    Teng, Yi
    Li, Qianru
    Tan, Nuopei
    Wang, Jiachen
    Zuo, Tingting
    Li, Tianyi
    Zheng, Yuanjie
    Xia, Changfa
    Chen, Wanqing
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (24) : 3093 - 3100
  • [32] Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Between China and the United States
    Yu LianshunJunior College of Suihua UniversityHeilongjiang Suihua
    考试与评价(大学英语教研版), 2011, (06) : 12 - 16
  • [33] Comparative analysis of cancer statistics in China and the United States in 2024
    Wu Yujie
    He Siyi
    Cao Mengdi
    Teng Yi
    Li Qianru
    Tan Nuopei
    Wang Jiachen
    Zuo Tingting
    Li Tianyi
    Zheng Yuanjie
    Xia Changfa
    Chen Wanqing
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2024, 137 (24)
  • [34] Abolitionism in the United States and Brazil: A comparative perspective
    Lichtenstein, A
    HISPANIC AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 1998, 78 (03) : 531 - 532
  • [35] Following the Example of Other Countries? Policy Analysis of New Legislation in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States
    Alasuutari, Pertti
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2014, 16 (03): : 266 - 279
  • [36] Emergence and growth of professional doctorates in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia: a comparative analysis
    Kot, Felly Chiteng
    Hendel, Darwin D.
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (03) : 345 - 364
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of Medicines Safety Advisories Released by Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom
    Perry, Lucy T.
    Bhasale, Alice
    Fabbri, Alice
    Lexchin, Joel
    Puil, Lorri
    Joarder, Maisah
    Mintzes, Barbara
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 982 - 984
  • [38] A Comparative Analysis of Civil Engineering Program Standards in Canada, the United States and Europe
    Perkins, S. A.
    ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2009, 79 (05): : 44 - 45
  • [39] A Comparative Analysis of Disability Policy in the United States and Canada Through an Occupational Lens
    Heeb, Rachel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2018, 72 (04):
  • [40] Regulating lobbyists: A comparative analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the European Union
    Chari, Raj
    Murphy, Gary
    Hogan, John
    POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2007, 78 (03): : 422 - 438