Hydropower Royalties: A Comparative Analysis of Major Producing Countries (China, Brazil, Canada and the United States)

被引:16
|
作者
Pineau, Pierre-Olivier [1 ]
Tranchecoste, Lucile [2 ]
Vega-Cardenas, Yenny [3 ]
机构
[1] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Law, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Law, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J7, Canada
关键词
hydropower; royalty; China; Brazil; Canada; United States;
D O I
10.3390/w9040287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydropower is the leading renewable source of electricity generation and a low emission energy source. In order to be developed sustainably, it is important that its costs and benefits are adequately set and distributed. Different mechanisms, such as royalties, can be used for this purpose. Governments have usually kept hydropower royalty rates low, without internalizing negative externalities. This strategy is inefficient because it leads to larger electricity production and consumption, and hence exacerbates environmental impacts. This paper reviews the criteria proposed and used to set hydropower royalties. It also compares practices of the four main hydropower producers in the world: China, Brazil, Canada and the United States. Results show that royalty rates and distribution policies are determined in an arbitrary and unsystematic manner, but also that water use is usually undervalued. In order to encourage the development of this key renewable resource, in a sustainable and responsible way, national and international efforts should be made to rationalize and harmonize hydropower royalty rates.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crime in Canada and in the United States: A comparative analysis
    Ouimet, M
    CANADIAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SOCIOLOGIE ET D ANTHROPOLOGIE, 1999, 36 (03): : 389 - 408
  • [2] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL AND LIVESTOCK COMMERCE OF THREE COUNTRIES (MEXICO, CHINA AND CANADA), WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1990-2011)
    Moreno-Ocampo, Argelia A.
    Leos-Rodriguez, Juan A.
    Contreras-Castillo, Jose M.
    Cruz-Delgado, Daniela
    AGRICULTURA SOCIEDAD Y DESARROLLO, 2015, 12 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [3] Comparative study of the scientific production on consumption associated with sustainability in four countries: United Kingdom, United States, China and Brazil
    de Oliveira, Fernanda Santana
    Caldeira-Pires, Armando
    do Nascimento, Elimar Pinheiro
    DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2023, 62 : 47 - 68
  • [4] Instruments of energy policy: Comparative analysis of Canada and the United States
    Varone, F
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2001, 34 (01): : 3 - 28
  • [5] A comparative analysis of safety advisories in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom
    Perry, Lucy T.
    Bhasale, Alice
    Fabbri, Alice
    Lexchin, Joel
    Puil, Lorri
    Joarder, Maisah
    Mintzes, Barbara
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 260 - 260
  • [6] Comparative Prices in Canada and the United States
    Michell, H.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1923, 107 : 149 - 154
  • [7] (Anti) environmental policy in the United States and Brazil: a comparative analysis
    Pinto, Raquel Giffoni
    Malerba, Julianna
    DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2022, 60 : 143 - 166
  • [8] Comparative efficiency analysis between Brazil, Mexico and The United States
    Duarte Duarte, Juan Benjamin
    Sierra Suarez, Katherine Julieth
    Rueda Ortiz, Victor Alfonso
    REVISTA FINANZAS Y POLITICA ECONOMICA, 2015, 7 (02): : 341 - 357
  • [9] A Comparative Analysis of the Catastrophe Insurance in China and the United States
    Wang Xiangnan
    Han Wenlong
    Xie Lu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 375 - 385
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Extended Producer Responsibility Policy in the United States and Canada
    Hickle, Garth T.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (02) : 249 - 261