Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments

被引:81
|
作者
Rinastiti, Margareta [1 ,2 ]
Oezcan, Mutlu [3 ]
Siswomihardjo, Widowati [4 ]
Busscher, Henk J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Biomed Engn, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Gadjah Mada Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Dent & Dent Hyg, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Gadjah Mada Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Immediate layering; Intermediate adhesive resin; Microhybrid composite; Nanofilled composite; Nanohybrid composite; Repair; Resin composite; Silica coating; Surface conditioning; RESIN COMPOSITES; CONDITIONING METHODS; AGING CONDITIONS; AGENTS; CONVERSION; ADHESION; PRIMERS; HYBRID; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.009
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate immediate repair bond strengths and failure types of resin composites with and without surface conditioning and characterize the interacting composite surfaces by their surface composition and roughness. Methods: Microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites were photo-polymerized and assigned to four groups: (1) no conditioning (Control), (2) no conditioning, polymerized against a Mylar strip (Control, with strip), (3) intermediate adhesive resin (IAR) application, and (4) chair-side silica coating, silanization and intermediate resin application (SC). Resin composites, similar as their substrates, were adhered onto the substrates. Shear force was applied to the interface in a universal testing machine and failure types were evaluated under light microscopy. Surface characterization was done by contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. Results: Significant effects of the resin composite type and surface conditioning were observed. Conditioning the composites with their IARs does not result in significant improvements in bond strength compared to the control with strip (bond strengths between 14.5 and 20.0 MPa). SC increased the bond strength in all composites except TE by an average 8.9 MPa, while in all composites the surface roughness increased from 7 to 384 mu m. Failure types in this group were exclusively cohesive. Physico-chemical modelling of the composite surfaces showed that the surfaces were dominated by the resin matrix, with a major increase in silica-coverage after SC for all composites. Conclusion: Intermediate adhesive resin conditioning did not improve the composite-to-composite immediate repair strength. Silica coating and silanization followed by its corresponding IAR, strongly increased repair bond strengths and provided exclusively cohesive failures in the substrate in all composites. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immediate vs Delayed Repair Bond Strength of a Nanohybrid Resin Composite
    El-Askary, Farid S.
    El-Banna, Ahmed H.
    van Noort, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 14 (03): : 265 - 274
  • [32] Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers
    Trajtenberg, CP
    Powers, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 17 (02): : 123 - 126
  • [33] Effect of Different Bleaching Methods on Monomer Release from Aged Microhybrid and Nanohybrid Resin Composites
    Abdollahpour, Siavash
    Estedlal, Tarane
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    Rafeie, Niyousha
    Nikparto, Nariman
    Abbasi, Mahdi
    Ranjbar Omrani, Ladan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 2023
  • [34] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT POLISHING SYSTEMS ON THE SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF MICROHYBRID COMPOSITES
    Brusaca Almeida Scheibe, Kristine Guara
    Brusaca Almeida, Karoline Guara
    Medeiros, Igor Studart
    Costa, Jose Ferreira
    Coelho Alves, Claudia Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2009, 17 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [35] Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments
    Kilinc, Hamiyet
    Sanal, Fatma Ayse
    Turgut, Sedanur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 12 (05): : 273 - 282
  • [36] Effect of Water Aging of Adherend Composite on Repair Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composites
    Nagano, Daiki
    Nakajima, Masatoshi
    Takahashi, Masahiro
    Ikeda, Masaomi
    Hosaka, Keiichi
    Sato, Kento
    Prasansuttiporn, Taweesak
    Foxton, Richard M.
    Tagami, Junji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 20 (05): : 425 - 433
  • [37] Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength
    Andreas Rathke
    Yana Tymina
    Bernd Haller
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2009, 13
  • [38] Bond strength of repaired composites with different surface treatments and bonding agents
    Souza, EM
    Souza, MHS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 2381 - 2381
  • [39] BOND STRENGTHS OF COMPOSITE TO ENAMEL WITH VARIOUS SURFACE TREATMENTS
    TJAN, AHL
    DUNN, JR
    ROCHE, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 523 - 523
  • [40] Comparative evaluation of the surface roughness of a microhybrid and nanohybrid composites using various polishing system: A profilometric analysis
    Kovoor, Kevin Lin
    Attavar, Shruthi H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 15 (04): : 372 - 376