Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments

被引:81
|
作者
Rinastiti, Margareta [1 ,2 ]
Oezcan, Mutlu [3 ]
Siswomihardjo, Widowati [4 ]
Busscher, Henk J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Biomed Engn, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Gadjah Mada Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Dent & Dent Hyg, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Gadjah Mada Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Biomat, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Immediate layering; Intermediate adhesive resin; Microhybrid composite; Nanofilled composite; Nanohybrid composite; Repair; Resin composite; Silica coating; Surface conditioning; RESIN COMPOSITES; CONDITIONING METHODS; AGING CONDITIONS; AGENTS; CONVERSION; ADHESION; PRIMERS; HYBRID; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.009
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate immediate repair bond strengths and failure types of resin composites with and without surface conditioning and characterize the interacting composite surfaces by their surface composition and roughness. Methods: Microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites were photo-polymerized and assigned to four groups: (1) no conditioning (Control), (2) no conditioning, polymerized against a Mylar strip (Control, with strip), (3) intermediate adhesive resin (IAR) application, and (4) chair-side silica coating, silanization and intermediate resin application (SC). Resin composites, similar as their substrates, were adhered onto the substrates. Shear force was applied to the interface in a universal testing machine and failure types were evaluated under light microscopy. Surface characterization was done by contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. Results: Significant effects of the resin composite type and surface conditioning were observed. Conditioning the composites with their IARs does not result in significant improvements in bond strength compared to the control with strip (bond strengths between 14.5 and 20.0 MPa). SC increased the bond strength in all composites except TE by an average 8.9 MPa, while in all composites the surface roughness increased from 7 to 384 mu m. Failure types in this group were exclusively cohesive. Physico-chemical modelling of the composite surfaces showed that the surfaces were dominated by the resin matrix, with a major increase in silica-coverage after SC for all composites. Conclusion: Intermediate adhesive resin conditioning did not improve the composite-to-composite immediate repair strength. Silica coating and silanization followed by its corresponding IAR, strongly increased repair bond strengths and provided exclusively cohesive failures in the substrate in all composites. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins
    Margareta Rinastiti
    Mutlu Özcan
    Widowati Siswomihardjo
    Henk J. Busscher
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2011, 15 : 625 - 633
  • [2] Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins
    Rinastiti, Margareta
    Oezcan, Mutlu
    Siswomihardjo, Widowati
    Busscher, Henk J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 15 (05) : 625 - 633
  • [3] Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing
    Oezcan, Mutlu
    Corazza, Pedro Henrique
    Salazar Marocho, Susana Maria
    Barbosa, Silvia Helena
    Bottino, Marco Antonio
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (07) : 1751 - 1758
  • [4] Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing
    Mutlu Özcan
    Pedro Henrique Corazza
    Susana Maria Salazar Marocho
    Silvia Helena Barbosa
    Marco Antonio Bottino
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 1751 - 1758
  • [5] POLISHING TECHNIQUES EFFECT ON MICROHYBRID, NANOHYBRID AND NANOFILLED COMPOSITES COLOR AND SURFACE ROUGHNESS STABILITY
    Schmitt, Vera Lucia
    Salata Nahsan, Flavia Pardo
    Naufel, Fabiana Scarparo
    Vaez, Savil Costa
    de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt
    Baseggio, Wagner
    Coelho Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre
    Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2016, 32 (01): : 262 - 271
  • [6] Effect of argon plasma on repair bond strength using nanofilled and microhybrid composites
    Negreiros, William Matthew
    Ayres, Ana Paula Almeida
    Willers, Amanda Endres
    Hirata, Ronaldo
    Giannini, Marcelo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 33 (05) : 713 - 719
  • [7] Effect of Different Surface Treatments and Roughness on the Repair Bond Strength of Aged Nanohybrid Composite
    Eren, Digdem
    Dogan, Canan Arslan
    Bektas, Ozden Ozel
    [J]. PHOTOBIOMODULATION PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2019, 37 (08) : 473 - 482
  • [8] Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures
    Daud, Alaa
    Adams, Alexander J.
    Shawkat, Athra
    Gray, Gordon
    Wilson, Nairn H. F.
    Lynch, Christopher D.
    Blum, Igor R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 99
  • [9] Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of indirect composites
    Souza, Evelise M.
    Francischone, Carlos E.
    Powers, John M.
    Rached, Rodrigo N.
    Vieira, Sergio
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 21 (02): : 93 - 96
  • [10] Effect Aging Conditions on the Repair Bond Strength of a Microhybrid and a Nanohybrid Resin Composite
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Cura, Cenk
    Brendeke, Johannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 12 (06): : 451 - 459