Official proficiency tests of the organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons: current status and future directions

被引:21
|
作者
Dubey, Vinita [1 ]
Velikeloth, Sanila [1 ]
Sliwakowski, Maciej [1 ]
Mallard, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Org Prohibit Chem Weap OPCW Lab, NL-2288 GN Rijswijk, Netherlands
关键词
Proficiency tests; Designated laboratories; Chemical weapons; Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-009-0520-0
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) has been organising and conducting Official Proficiency Tests (PT) since 1996 in accordance with ILAC-G13 to certify laboratories for the analysis of authentic samples under the provision of Chemical Weapons Convention. The tests are part of a mechanism to ensure that there are laboratories that have proven competence in the analysis of chemicals related to the Convention. Laboratories that have successfully completed the tests are designated by the Director General of the OPCW for analysis of authentic samples. To maintain the Designated Laboratory status, a laboratory must take and pass at least one of the two proficiency tests offered per calendar year. Unlike many proficiency tests, the OPCW PT is qualitative, that is the laboratories must determine if any of a very large set (essentially infinite) of chemicals relevant to the Convention are present in the samples. The tests are organised with the assistance of two laboratories, one preparing the test samples, and the other evaluating the test results. The paper provides an overview of the current status of these PTs and outlines salient features regarding procedure and scope of tests, selection of assisting laboratories, scoring and performance rating of participating labs. The emerging issues are also briefly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 437
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Schizotaxia: Current status and future directions
    Ming T. Tsuang
    William S. Stone
    Franziska Gamma
    Stephen V. Faraone
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2003, 5 (2) : 128 - 134
  • [22] Vasculitis: Current Status and Future Directions
    Pierre Youinou
    Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2008, 35 : 1 - 4
  • [23] Current status and future directions of geoportals
    Jiang, Hao
    van Genderen, John
    Mazzetti, Paolo
    Koo, Hyeongmo
    Chen, Min
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2020, 13 (10) : 1093 - 1114
  • [24] Biosimilars: current status and future directions
    Roger, Simon D.
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2010, 10 (07) : 1011 - 1018
  • [25] Teledermatology: Current status and future directions
    Whited J.D.
    American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2001, 2 (2) : 59 - 64
  • [26] Division of Chemical Education on-line conference: "Current status and future directions"
    Hoffman, Morton Z.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 231
  • [27] Childhood Status Epilepticus: Current Status and Future Directions
    Kalra, Veena
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 57 (03) : 205 - 206
  • [28] Childhood Status Epilepticus: Current Status and Future Directions
    Veena Kalra
    Indian Pediatrics, 2020, 57 : 205 - 206
  • [29] Cancer Immunotherapy Current Status and Future Directions
    Ito, Fumito
    Chang, Alfred E.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 22 (04) : 765 - +
  • [30] Cell processing: Current status and future directions
    Stroncek, D
    Read, EJ
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 45 : 1 - 4