How Reliable Is the "Scratch Test" Versus the Weber Test After Tympanomastoid Surgery?

被引:9
|
作者
Iacovidou, Aphrodite [1 ]
Giblett, Neil [1 ]
Doshi, Jayesh [1 ]
Jindal, Mundit [1 ]
机构
[1] New Cross Hosp, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
关键词
Mastoid surgery; Postoperative test; Scratch test; Tuning fork; Tympanoplasty; Tympanomastoid surgery; Weber test; TUNING FORK TESTS;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000000357
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To identify whether the scratch test can be used as an alternative to the Weber's test after tympanomastoid surgery. Methods: This twin-center prospective study assessed major tympanomastoid surgery patients over a 6-month period. Patients were assessed postoperatively on Day 0 or Day 1 of surgery using a standardized proforma. A Weber's test was performed using a 512-Hz tuning fork, placed midline on the forehead to assess the direction of sound localization. This was directly compared with a scratch test, by asking the patient the following while scratching the head bandage in the midline: "Can you hear this? And which side is loudest?" Results: Fifty-six patients were assessed in total. Sixteen mastoid explorations, 14 tympanoplasties, 18 combined approach tympanoplasties, and 8 other procedures were included, all of which had standard external auditory canal packing and head bandage. Assessment with Weber's test found 41 patients to have sound lateralizing to the operated ear. In comparison, 50 patients lateralized sound to the operated ear with the scratch test. Overall, Weber's test had a sensitivity of 73.2% and specificity of 100% compared with a sensitivity of 89.3% and specificity of 100% for the "Scratch Test." No patients had a dead ear after surgery. Conclusion: The scratch test proved to be more accurate than traditional postoperative tuning fork assessment and provides a quick, accurate, and simple solution for when such equipment is unavailable.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 763
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How valid is the ‘eyeball test’ in evaluating patients for vascular surgery?
    N. Collins
    E. G. Kavanagh
    M. P. Colgan
    P. Madhavan
    D. J. Moore
    C. D. Shanik
    Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2005, 174 (Suppl 1)
  • [32] Cheating after the test: who does it and how often?
    Ottaway, Kristine
    Murrant, Coral
    Ritchie, Kerry
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2017, 41 (03) : 368 - 374
  • [33] THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM AND RORSCHACH TEST BEFORE AND AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY
    BARNES, TC
    HAND, BM
    DESILVERIO, RV
    MORGAN, AJ
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1959, 11 (02): : 400 - 400
  • [34] Furosemide Stress Test after Neonatal Cardiac Surgery
    Alten, J.
    Kwall, K.
    Martin, K.
    Crawford, J.
    Borasino, S.
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 1209 - 1209
  • [35] How Accurate is the parts per thousandEyeball Test? A Comparison of Physicians' Subjective Assessment Versus Statistical Methods in Estimating Mortality Risk after Cardiac Surgery
    Jain, Renuka
    Kuskowski, Michael
    Selcuk, Adabag
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [36] Real Assessment of Maximum Oxygen Uptake as a Verification After an Incremental Test Versus Without a Test
    Hebisz, Paulina
    Jastrzebska, Agnieszka Danuta
    Hebisz, Rafal
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [37] Personal versus extrapersonal neglect: A group study of their dissociation using a reliable clinical test
    Beschin, N
    Robertson, IH
    CORTEX, 1997, 33 (02) : 379 - 384
  • [38] How reliable is the short synacthen test for the investigation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis?
    Bangar, V
    Clayton, RN
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1998, 139 (06) : 580 - 583
  • [39] How reliable is the low dose synacthen test as an indicator of adrenal function in the paediatric population?
    Mushtaq, Talat
    Shakur, Faheem
    Wales, Jerry K.
    Wright, Neil P.
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 2006, 65 : 121 - 121
  • [40] CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE LIMULUS TEST AFTER DIGESTIVE SURGERY
    KIMURA, Y
    NAKAO, A
    TAMURA, E
    TANAKA, S
    TAKAGI, H
    SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 25 (09): : 790 - 794