Network Meta-analysis and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Posaconazole, and Voriconazole in Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis

被引:45
|
作者
Zhao, Ying Jiao [1 ]
Khoo, Ai Leng [1 ]
Tan, Gloria [2 ]
Teng, Monica [1 ]
Tee, Caroline [3 ]
Tan, Ban Hock [4 ]
Ong, Benjamin [2 ]
Lim, Boon Peng [1 ]
Chai, Louis Yi Ann [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Healthcare Grp, Grp Corp Dev, Pharm & Therapeut Off, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Hlth Sci Author, Hlth Prod Regulat Grp, Pharmacoecon & Drug Utilisat, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med & Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Univ Med Cluster, Div Infect Dis, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
CELL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA; DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL; ANTIFUNGAL PROPHYLAXIS; NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS; INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; VS; FLUCONAZOLE;
D O I
10.1128/AAC.01985-15
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and large economic burdens. Triazole prophylaxis is used for at-risk patients with hematological malignancies or stem cell transplants. We evaluated both the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of triazole prophylaxis. A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating fluconazole, itraconazole capsule and solution, posaconazole, and voriconazole was conducted. The outcomes of interest included the incidences of IFIs and deaths. This was coupled with a cost-effectiveness analysis from patient perspective over a lifetime horizon. Probabilities of transitions between health states were derived from the NMA. Resource use and costs were obtained from the Singapore health care institution. Data on 5,505 participants in 21 RCTs were included. Other than itraconazole capsule, all triazole antifungals were effective in reducing IFIs. Posaconazole was better than fluconazole (odds ratio [OR], 0.35 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.73]) and itraconazole capsule (OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97]), but not voriconazole (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.43 to 4.01]), in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole significantly reduced all-cause deaths, compared to placebo, fluconazole, and itraconazole solution (OR, 0.49 to 0.54 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.88]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for itraconazole solution was lower than that for posaconazole (Singapore dollars [SGD] 12,546 versus SGD 26,817 per IFI avoided and SGD 5,844 versus SGD 12,423 per LY saved) for transplant patients. For leukemia patients, itraconazole solution was the dominant strategy. Voriconazole was dominated by posaconazole. All triazole antifungals except itraconazole capsule were effective in preventing IFIs. Posaconazole was more efficacious in reducing IFIs and all-cause deaths than were fluconazole and itraconazole. Both itraconazole solution and posaconazole were cost-effective in the Singapore health care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 386
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INDICATIVE BUDGET IMPACT OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE IN INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH AML/MDS
    Ahir, H. B.
    Taymor, E.
    Sung, A.
    Brese, B.
    Mayes, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A783 - A784
  • [22] Posaconazole versus voriconazole as antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal diseases in patients with hematological malignancies
    Almutairy, Reem
    Khan, Mansoor Ahmed
    Shahbar, Alaa
    Aseeri, Mohammed
    Alshamrani, Majed
    Almarhabi, Hassan
    Naeem, Doaa
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [23] COST-EFFECT ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF POSACONAZOLE FOR PROPHYLAXIS OF INVASIVE MYCOSES COMPARED TO FLUCONAZOLE AND ITRACONAZOLE IN PATIENTS WITH PRONOUNCED NEUTROPENIA
    Kolbin, A. S.
    Klimko, N.
    Koroleva, O.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A211 - A211
  • [24] Posaconazole vs. fluconazole as invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in China: a multicenter, randomized, open-label study
    Shen, Yang
    Huang, Xiao-Jun
    Wang, Jian-Xiang
    Jin, Jie
    Hu, Jian-Da
    Yu, Kang
    Wu, De-Pei
    Wang, Shu-Jie
    Yu, Li
    Chen, Xie-Qun
    Liu, Ting
    Liang, Ying-Ming
    Chen, Fang-Ping
    Li, Yan
    Shen, Zhi-Xiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 51 (09) : 738 - 745
  • [25] Cost Effectiveness of Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole/Itraconazole in Prophylactic Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Mexico
    Rely, Kely
    Alexandre, Pierre K.
    Salinas Escudero, Guillermo
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : S39 - S42
  • [26] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF POSACONAZOLE COMPARED TO FLUCONAZOLE/ITRACONAZOLE FOR THE PREVENTION OF INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    Athanasakis, K.
    Petrakis, I
    Kyriopoulos, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A393 - A393
  • [27] Fluconazole prophylaxis prevent fungal invasive infection in VLBW infants
    Bertini, G
    Dani, C
    Filippi, L
    Pratesi, S
    Rubaltelli, FF
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 392A - 392A
  • [28] Is there an interest of new techniques for dosing posaconazole in invasive fungal infection prophylaxis?
    Gabellier, L.
    Vincent, M.
    Mathieu, O.
    Hicheri, Y.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 51 : S393 - S394
  • [29] COST UTILITY OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE/ITRACONAZOLE THERAPY IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS AMONG HIGH-RISK NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS IN MEXICO
    Rely, K.
    Pierre, K. A.
    Salinas, E. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A490 - A491
  • [30] COST UTILITY OF POSACONAZOLE VERSUS FLUCONAZOLE/ITRACONAZOLE THERAPY IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS AMONG HIGH-RISK NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS IN MEXICO
    Rely, K.
    Pierre, K. A.
    Salinas, E. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A50 - A50