AMBIENT AWARENESS AND KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION: USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO LEARN "WHO KNOWS WHAT" AND "WHO KNOWS WHOM"

被引:275
|
作者
Leonardi, Paul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Technol Management Program, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social networking sites; knowledge sharing; organizational learning; accuracy; technology use; communication; collaboration; transparency; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY-SYSTEMS; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; DISTANCE; NETWORK;
D O I
10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The argument proffered in this paper is that use of enterprise social networking technologies can increase the accuracy of people's metaknowledge (knowledge of "who knows what" and "who knows whom") at work. The results of a quasi-natural field experiment in which only one of two matched-sample groups within a large financial services firm was given access to the enterprise social networking technology for six months revealed that by making people's communications with specific partners visible to others in the organization, the technology enabled observers to become aware of the communications occurring amongst their coworkers and to make inferences about what and whom those coworkers knew based on the contents of the messages they sent and to whom they were sent. Consequently only individuals in the group that used the social networking technology for six months improved the accuracy of their metaknowledge (a 31% improvement in knowledge of who knows what and an 88% improvement in knowledge of who knows whom). There were no improvements in the other group over the same time period. Based on these findings, how technologically enabled "ambient awareness"-awareness of ambient communications occurring amongst others in the organization-can be an important antecedent for knowledge acquisition is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 762
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Who Knows Television? Online Access and the Gatekeepers of Knowledge
    Noordegraaf, Julia
    CRITICAL STUDIES IN TELEVISION, 2010, 5 (02) : 1 - 19
  • [42] Competence: What's in? What's out? Who knows?
    Alexander, Joshua
    Mallon, Ronald
    Weinberg, Jonathan M.
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2010, 33 (04) : 329 - +
  • [43] WHO KNOWS WHAT THE YEAR-2000 WILL BRING
    BRENNER, E
    ONLINE & CDROM REVIEW, 1993, 17 (02): : 102 - 104
  • [44] Who knows what Mary Knew? An experimental study
    Gregory, Daniel
    Hendrickx, Malte
    Turner, Cameron
    PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 35 (04) : 522 - 545
  • [45] "Anyone who knows me, knows..." -Formulaic Authentication Self Assessments in Media Interviews
    Hauser, Stefan
    Meier, Simon
    DEUTSCHE SPRACHE, 2014, 42 (02): : 121 - 138
  • [46] Who knows what about whom: What role does common ground play in accessing distant information?
    Lea, RB
    Mason, RA
    Albrecht, JE
    Birch, SL
    Myers, JL
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 39 (01) : 70 - 84
  • [47] WHO KNOWS WHAT WHEN? APPARENT BIAS AND ARBITRATION
    Fairclough, Thomas
    CAMBRIDGE LAW JOURNAL, 2021, 80 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [48] Who knows what... Research on Poland in Germany
    Bingen, Dieter
    Loew, Peter Oliver
    OSTEUROPA, 2006, 56 (11-12): : 297 - 299
  • [49] Who Knows Who Knows What in the Group? The Effects of Communication Network Centralities, Use of Digital Knowledge Repositories, and Work Remoteness on Organizational Members' Accuracy in Expertise Recognition
    Su, Chunke
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (05) : 614 - 640
  • [50] Who one is, whom one knows? Evaluating the importance of personal and social characteristics of influential people in social networks
    Hassanzadeh, Mehdi
    Taheri, Mohammad
    Shokouhyar, Sajjad
    Shokoohyar, Sina
    ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 75 (06) : 1008 - 1032