Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery - A randomized trial

被引:321
|
作者
Whelan, T
Levine, M
Willan, A
Gafni, A
Sanders, K
Mirsky, D
Chambers, S
O'Brien, MA
Reid, S
Dubois, S
机构
[1] Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[5] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Queensway Carleton Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.292.4.435
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The long-term results of randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent survival rates for mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Consequently, the choice of treatment should be based on a patient's preferences. Objective To evaluate the impact of a decision aid regarding the different surgical treatment options on patient decision making. Design and Setting A cluster randomized trial for which general surgeons in the communities of central-west, and eastern Ontario, Canada, were randomly assigned to use the decision aid or not in the surgical consultation. Patients received the decision aid or not based on the surgeon seen. Participants Twenty surgeons participated in the study. Of the 208 eligible women with newly diagnosed clinical stage I or 11 breast cancer seen by study surgeons, 201 agreed to be evaluated: 94 were assigned to the decision board and 107 to usual practice. Patients were recruited from November 1999 to April 2002. Intervention The decision board is a decision aid designed to help physicians inform their patients about different treatment options and to enable patients to express a preference for treatment. Main Outcome Measures Patient knowledge about the surgical treatment of breast cancer; decisional conflict; satisfaction with decision making; and the treatment decision following the consultation. Results Patients in the decision board group had higher knowledge scores about their treatment options (66.9 vs 58.7; P<.001), had less decisional conflict (1.40 vs 1.62, P=.02), and were more satisfied with decision making (4.50 vs 4.32, P=.05) following the consultation. Patients who used the decision board were more likely to choose BCT (94% vs 76%, P=.03). Conclusions The decision board was helpful in improving communication and enabling women to make a choice regarding treatment. Such instruments should be considered by surgeons when communicating the different surgical options to women with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 441
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pilot trial of a computerized decision aid for breast cancer prevention
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Annis, Caroline
    Adduci, Kelly
    Showstack, Jonathan
    Esserman, Laura
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (02): : 147 - 154
  • [32] Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Masahito Jimbo
    Karen Kelly-Blake
    Ananda Sen
    Sarah T Hawley
    Mack T Ruffin
    [J]. Trials, 14
  • [33] The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial
    Sheridan, Stacey L.
    Draeger, Lindy B.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    Rimer, Barbara
    Bangdiwala, Shrikant I.
    Cai, Jianwen
    Gizlice, Ziya
    Keyserling, Thomas C.
    Simpson, Ross J., Jr.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2014, 14
  • [34] Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jimbo, Masahito
    Kelly-Blake, Karen
    Sen, Ananda
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Ruffin, Mack T.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [35] The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial
    Stacey L Sheridan
    Lindy B Draeger
    Michael P Pignone
    Barbara Rimer
    Shrikant I Bangdiwala
    Jianwen Cai
    Ziya Gizlice
    Thomas C Keyserling
    Ross J Simpson
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14
  • [36] DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL TO FACILITATE TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Stephenson, Andrew
    Krebs, Tracy
    Berglund, Ryan
    Campbell, Steven
    Ciezki, Jay
    Fergany, Amr
    Gong, Michael
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Klein, Eric
    Stein, Robert
    Tendulkar, Rahul
    Kattan, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E663 - E663
  • [37] Piloting a parent and patient decision aid to support clinical trial decision making in childhood cancer
    Robertson, Eden G.
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Cohn, Richard J.
    Battisti, Robert A.
    Donoghoe, Mark W.
    Ziegler, David S.
    Fardell, Joanna E.
    Mitchell, Richard
    O'Brien, Tracey A.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (07) : 1520 - 1529
  • [38] Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Newman, Lisa
    Griggs, Jennifer J.
    Kosir, Mary Ann
    Katz, Steven J.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (02): : 161 - 169
  • [39] Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer
    Sarah T. Hawley
    Lisa Newman
    Jennifer J. Griggs
    Mary Ann Kosir
    Steven J. Katz
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9 : 161 - 169
  • [40] Supporting Women with Breast Cancer in Making an Informed Decision about Breast Reconstruction: The Development of an Online Decision Aid
    Ter Stege, Jacqueline
    Oldenburg, Hester
    van Huizum, Martine
    The, Regina
    van Duijnhoven, Frederieke
    Hahn, Daniela
    Sherman, Kerry
    Witkamp, Arjen
    Bleiker, Eveline
    Woerdeman, Leonie
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 91 - 91