Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery - A randomized trial

被引:321
|
作者
Whelan, T
Levine, M
Willan, A
Gafni, A
Sanders, K
Mirsky, D
Chambers, S
O'Brien, MA
Reid, S
Dubois, S
机构
[1] Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[5] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Queensway Carleton Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.292.4.435
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The long-term results of randomized trials have demonstrated equivalent survival rates for mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Consequently, the choice of treatment should be based on a patient's preferences. Objective To evaluate the impact of a decision aid regarding the different surgical treatment options on patient decision making. Design and Setting A cluster randomized trial for which general surgeons in the communities of central-west, and eastern Ontario, Canada, were randomly assigned to use the decision aid or not in the surgical consultation. Patients received the decision aid or not based on the surgeon seen. Participants Twenty surgeons participated in the study. Of the 208 eligible women with newly diagnosed clinical stage I or 11 breast cancer seen by study surgeons, 201 agreed to be evaluated: 94 were assigned to the decision board and 107 to usual practice. Patients were recruited from November 1999 to April 2002. Intervention The decision board is a decision aid designed to help physicians inform their patients about different treatment options and to enable patients to express a preference for treatment. Main Outcome Measures Patient knowledge about the surgical treatment of breast cancer; decisional conflict; satisfaction with decision making; and the treatment decision following the consultation. Results Patients in the decision board group had higher knowledge scores about their treatment options (66.9 vs 58.7; P<.001), had less decisional conflict (1.40 vs 1.62, P=.02), and were more satisfied with decision making (4.50 vs 4.32, P=.05) following the consultation. Patients who used the decision board were more likely to choose BCT (94% vs 76%, P=.03). Conclusions The decision board was helpful in improving communication and enabling women to make a choice regarding treatment. Such instruments should be considered by surgeons when communicating the different surgical options to women with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 441
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Decision Aids on Treatment Decision Making for Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lam, Wendy W. T.
    Chan, Miranda
    Or, Amy
    Kwong, Ava
    Suen, Dacita
    Fielding, Richard
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 23 - 23
  • [2] A randomized trial of a decision aid for breast cancer surgery
    Goel, V
    Sawka, C
    Thiel, E
    Gort, E
    O'Connor, A
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [3] Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer
    Goel, V
    Sawka, CA
    Thiel, EC
    Gort, EH
    O'Connor, AM
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [4] Supporting Treatment Decision Making in Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Considering Chemotherapy
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Clarke, Stephen J.
    McJannett, Margaret
    Beale, Philip J.
    Wilcken, Nicholas R. C.
    Moore, Malcolm J.
    Chen, Eric X.
    Goldstein, David
    Horvath, Lisa
    Knox, Jennifer J.
    Krzyzanowska, Monika
    Oza, Amit M.
    Feld, Ronald
    Hedley, David
    Xu, Wei
    Tattersall, Martin H. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15) : 2077 - 2084
  • [5] Influence of shared decision making with decision aids on decisional conflict and regret in breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    Lin, Shi-Qian
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [6] Improving Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment Decision Making: The iCanDecide Randomized Clinical Trial
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Li, Yun
    An, Lawrence C.
    Resnicow, Kenneth
    Janz, Nancy K.
    Sabel, Michael S.
    Ward, Kevin C.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Morrow, Monica
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Hofer, Timothy P.
    Katz, Steven J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) : 659 - +
  • [7] A decision aid versus shared decision making for prostate cancer screening results of a randomized, controlled trial
    Stamm, Andrew W.
    Banerji, John S.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Slee, April
    Akapame, Sydney
    Dahl, Kathryn
    Massman, John D., III
    Soung, Michael C.
    Pittenger, Kim R.
    Corman, John M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 8910 - 8917
  • [8] Reducing Treatment Decision Conflict Difficulties in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lam, Wendy W. T.
    Chan, Miranda
    Or, Amy
    Kwong, Ava
    Suen, Dacita
    Fielding, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (23) : 2879 - +
  • [9] Evaluation of the effect of a patient decision aid about vasectomy on the decision-making process a randomized trial
    Labrecque, Michel
    Paunescu, Cristina
    Plesu, Ioana
    Stacey, Dawn
    Legare, France
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (06) : 556 - 562
  • [10] Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Volk, Robert J.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Escoto, Kamisha H.
    Cantor, Scott B.
    Munden, Reginald F.
    Rabius, Vance A.
    Bailey, Linda
    Cinciripini, Paul M.
    Lin, Heather
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Luckett, Pamela Graef
    Esparza, Angelina
    Godoy, Myrna C.
    Bevers, Therese B.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (01)