TTIP and Intra-European Trade: Boon or Bane?

被引:3
|
作者
Aichele, Rahel [2 ,4 ]
Felbermayr, Gabriel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heiland, Inga [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[2] CESifo, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Nottingham, GEP, Sir Clive Granger Bldg,Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Ctr Int Econ, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Ifo Inst, Leibniz Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
来源
关键词
TTIP; single market; European integration;
D O I
10.1515/jbnst-2015-1040
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The European Union is the world's deepest free trade zone. Amongst its members, it has abolished tariffs and lowered non-tariff barriers. This has led to trade creation within Europe and to trade diversion between EU countries and outsiders. Deep trade integration and the resulting mutual dependence has, in the eyes of many, facilitated political integration. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will undo some of these effects by means of preference erosion, so that cross-country trade links within Europe may lose relative prominence. However, the presence of a rich fabric of regional value chains in Europe and substantial income effects could counter this development. We provide insights on the empirical importance of these effects based on a New Quantitative Trade Model. We show that TTIP could indeed lower trade integration in Europe since predicted income effects turn out not to be large enough to overcome the effects of preference erosion. However, there is substantial heterogeneity across sectors and countries. One way to minimize preference erosion would be to promote projects and programs to further deepen the EU's single market.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 664
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ABORTION - BANE OR BOON
    SCHUYLER, JB
    NIGERIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, : 11 - 15
  • [42] Access: Bane and Boon
    Patterson, Cynthia
    AMERICAN PERIODICALS, 2007, 17 (01): : 117 - 118
  • [43] NGOs:: Boon or bane?
    不详
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ASIA, 2000, 30 (03) : 422 - 423
  • [44] The skyscraper: Boon or bane?
    Klaber, Eugene Henry
    JOURNAL OF LAND AND PUBLIC UTILITY ECONOMICS, 1930, 6 (04): : 354 - 358
  • [45] ART: Boon or bane?
    Lynn R. Fraser
    Nature Medicine, 2002, 8 (Suppl 10) : S10 - S13
  • [46] Gliotoxin - bane or boon?
    Scharf, Daniel H.
    Brakhage, Axel A.
    Mukherjee, Prasun K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 18 (04) : 1096 - 1109
  • [48] FOG - BOON OR BANE?
    Bendix, Joerg
    Eugster, Werner
    Klemm, Otto
    ERDKUNDE, 2011, 65 (03) : 229 - 232
  • [49] Bioplastics: A boon or bane?
    Nandakumar, Ardra
    Chuah, Jo-Ann
    Sudesh, Kumar
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 147
  • [50] TELEVISION: BOON OR BANE?
    Gould, Jack
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1946, 10 (03) : 314 - 320