Motivating participation and improving quality of contribution in ubiquitous crowdsourcing

被引:42
|
作者
Goncalves, Jorge [1 ]
Hosio, Simo [1 ]
Rogstadius, Jakob [2 ]
Karapanos, Evangelos [2 ]
Kostakos, Vassilis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Madeira, Madeira Interact Technol Inst, Polo Cient & Tecnol Madeira, P-9020105 Funchal, Portugal
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Ubiquitous Crowdsourcing; Motivation; Participation; Performance; Engagement; SENSE; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.002
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ubiquitous crowdsourcing, or the crowdsourcing of tasks in settings beyond the desktop, is attracting interest due to the increasing maturity of mobile and ubiquitous technology, such as smartphones and public displays. In this paper we attempt to address a fundamental challenge in ubiquitous crowdsourcing if people can contribute to crowdsourcing anytime and anyplace, why would they choose to do so? We highlight the role of motivation in ubiquitous crowdsourcing, and its effect on participation and performance. Through a series of field studies we empirically validate various motivational approaches in the context of ubiquitous crowdsourcing, and assess the comparable advantages of ubiquitous technologies' affordances. We show that through motivation ubiquitous crowdsourcing becomes comparable to online crowdsourcing in terms of participation and task performance, and that through motivation we can elicit better quality contributions and increased participation from workers. We also show that ubiquitous technologies' contextual capabilities can increase participation through increasing workers' intrinsic motivation, and that the in-situ nature of ubiquitous technologies can increase both participation and engagement of workers. Combined, our findings provide empirically validated recommendations on the design and implementation of ubiquitous crowdsourcing. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 48
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Quality Through Nursing Participation at Bedside Rounds
    Jimenez, Rafael Acal
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 67 (02) : E120 - E120
  • [22] Improving the quality of evaluation participation: a meta-evaluation
    Russ-Eft, Darlene
    Preskill, Hallie
    HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 11 (01) : 35 - 50
  • [23] Citizens Participation in Improving Rural Communities Quality of Life
    Soligno, Roberta
    Scorza, Francesco
    Amato, Federico
    Casas, Giuseppe Las
    Murgante, Beniamino
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2015, PT II, 2015, 9156 : 731 - 746
  • [24] Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing
    Karin Hansson
    Thomas Ludwig
    Tanja Aitamurto
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2019, 28 : 977 - 1000
  • [25] Crowdsourcing and open source software participation
    Olson, David L.
    Rosacker, Kirsten
    SERVICE BUSINESS, 2013, 7 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [26] Crowdsourcing and open source software participation
    David L. Olson
    Kirsten Rosacker
    Service Business, 2013, 7 : 499 - 511
  • [27] Participation recommendation system for crowdsourcing contests
    Baba, Yukino
    Kinoshita, Kei
    Kashima, Hisashi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 58 : 174 - 183
  • [28] Online Community Participation and Crowdsourcing Performance
    Jin, Yuan
    AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [29] Capitalizing Relationships: Modes of Participation in Crowdsourcing
    Hansson, Karin
    Ludwig, Thomas
    Aitamurto, Tanja
    COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK-THE JOURNAL OF COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING AND WORK PRACTICES, 2019, 28 (05): : 977 - 1000
  • [30] Improving the Efficiency of Crowdsourcing Contests
    Xu, Haifeng
    Larson, Kate
    AAMAS'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS & MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, : 461 - 468