Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions - A qualitative approach

被引:20
|
作者
Qin, Wei [1 ]
Brown, J. Lynne [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Food Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
consumer attitude; genetic engineering; genetically modified food; knowledge; information; communication;
D O I
10.1177/1075547006294770
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
American consumers remain uninformed about genetically engineered (GE) foods, raising the prospect of their rejection based on outrage rather than risk. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering introduction of GE salmon into the food supply, an animal application likely to raise consumer concerns. As the first step in designing balanced information to help consumers reach informed opinions about GE salmon, we held eleven focus group discussions to compare the effect of limited (six groups) and detailed (five groups) information on the participants' formulated consequences of this GE application. The results suggested that an effective communication piece about a specific GE application should contain basic and specific, including process- and product-related, information to help the recipient formulate consequences, and hence, opinions. It should also incorporate multiple viewpoints on certain and uncertain consequences to increase perceptions of source trustworthiness and help consumers reach informed opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 272
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Midwifery students' opinions about episiotomy training and using virtual reality: A qualitative study
    Demir-Kaymak, Zeliha
    Turan, Zekiye
    Cit, Guluzar
    Akyaman, Serefraz
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 132
  • [42] The opinions of postgraduate nursing students about evidence- based practice: A qualitative study
    Yurt, Seher
    Kolac, Nurcan
    Deniz, Esra
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (02): : 286 - 292
  • [43] Beyond beliefs: A qualitative study of people's opinions about their changing relations with their voices
    Hayward, Mark
    Awenat, Yvonne
    Jones, Simon McCarthy
    Paulik, Georgie
    Berry, Katherine
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2015, 7 (02): : 97 - 107
  • [44] ROMANIAN STUDENTS' OPINIONS ON IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE APPROACH
    Pisica, Alina Iorga
    Ioan, Roxana
    Bucur, Louisa-Maria
    Popa, Alexandru
    Zaharia, Rodica Milena
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2024, 23 (02):
  • [45] WILL REAL CONSUMER ACTIVIST PLEASE STAND UP - EXAMINATION OF CONSUMERS OPINIONS ABOUT MARKETING PRACTICES
    HUSTAD, TP
    PESSEMIE.EA
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1973, 10 (03) : 319 - 324
  • [46] No effect of partisan framing on opinions about the COVID-19 pandemic
    Myers, C. Daniel
    JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2021, 31 : 132 - 144
  • [47] Patients' Opinions about Knowing Their Risk for Depression and What to Do about It. The PredictD-Qualitative Study
    Bellon, Juan A.
    Moreno-Peral, Patricia
    Moreno-Kuestner, Berta
    Motrico, Emma
    Aiarzagueena, Jose M.
    Fernandez, Anna
    Fernandez-Alonso, Carmen
    Monton-Franco, Carmen
    Rodriguez-Bayon, Antonina
    Isabel Ballesta-Rodriguez, Maria
    Ruentel-Geidel, Ariadne
    Payo-Gordon, Janire
    Serrano-Blanco, Antoni
    Olivan-Blazquez, Barbara
    Araujo, Luz
    del Mar Munoz-Garcia, Maria
    King, Michael
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Amezcua, Manuel
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [48] Commentary: A structural approach to Berkson's fallacy and a guide to a history of opinions about it
    Snoep, Jaapjan D.
    Morabia, Alfredo
    Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (02) : 515 - 521
  • [49] Gauging Opinions About the Citizenship Amendment Act and NRC: A Twitter Analysis Approach
    Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan
    Eachempati, Prajwal
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 29 (05) : 176 - 193
  • [50] THE EFFECT OF ACCURATE INFORMATION ON OPINIONS OF THE CANADIAN CRIMINAL-JUSTICE SYSTEM
    HOOEY, B
    ZAMBLE, E
    CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 1994, 35 (2A): : 57 - 57