Site selection of construction waste recycling plant

被引:41
|
作者
Shi, Qingwei [1 ]
Ren, Hong [1 ]
Ma, Xianrui [1 ]
Xiao, Yanqing [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Construct Management & Real Estate, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Construction waste; Reverse logistics; Location optimization; Genetic algorithm; OPERATIONS-RESEARCH; SUPPLY CHAIN; MANAGEMENT; NETWORK; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.252
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the background of the development of construction waste recycling in China, optimizing the site of construction waste recycling and disposal plant is important, considering not only the cost of construction waste recycling but also the impact on the surrounding environment. This study aims to minimize the cost and negative environmental effects. In order to find the best method to solve the problem of multiobjective function optimization, we propose a multiobjective location model which combines genetic algorithm with probabilistic robust optimization. The model first uses genetic algorithm to get preliminary result and then it uses probabilistic robust optimization to find the optimal solution. The preliminary results show that 1, 3, 5 of the candidate sites more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than other. The fitness value converges at a stable value of 1.55 x 10(-5), and the Pareto optimal frontier presents considerable clustering characteristics, which prove the rationality and operability of the site selection optimization model. Meanwhile, the robust model analysis under the given uncertain environment achieves the purpose of further optimization of the site. The research results can provide the government with a theoretical basis for the site selection of construction and demolition waste recycling plants. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 542
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recycling of Contaminated Construction and Demolition Wood Waste
    Rautkoski, Hille
    Vaha-Nissi, Mika
    Kataja, Kirsi
    Gestranius, Marie
    Liukkonen, Sari
    Maattanen, Marjo
    Liukkonen, Johanna
    Kouko, Jarmo
    Asikainen, Sari
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2016, 7 (03) : 615 - 624
  • [42] The Ways of Recycling of Solid Inorganic Construction Waste
    Wang Hongjie
    FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND MEASURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-3, 2011, 230-232 : 834 - 836
  • [43] Study on recycling of waste soils in road construction
    Honda, Atsuhiro
    Yamada, Masaru
    Ninomiya, Toshiaki
    Takemoto, Ryoshin
    Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Osaka City University, 1987, 28 : 203 - 211
  • [44] Environmental feasibility of recycling construction and demolition waste
    Atta, I.
    Bakhoum, E. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (03) : 2675 - 2694
  • [45] RECYCLING ASH PRODUCTION WASTE IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
    Kalinina, E.
    Vaisman, Ya.
    Rudakova, L.
    12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference, SGEM 2012, Vol. IV, 2012, : 753 - 759
  • [46] Recycling waste rubber tyres in road construction
    Barišić, Ivana
    Zvonarić, Matija
    Grubeša, Ivanka Netinger
    Šurdonja, Sanja
    Archives of Civil Engineering, 2021, 67 (01): : 499 - 512
  • [47] A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling
    Tam, VW
    Tam, CM
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2006, 47 (03) : 209 - 221
  • [48] RECYCLING WASTE RUBBER TYRES IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
    Barisic, Ivana
    Zvonaric, Matija
    Grubesa, Ivanka Netinger
    Surdonja, Sanja
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 67 (01) : 499 - 512
  • [49] Recycling of Construction Waste in Terms of Sustainable Building
    Adamczyk, Janusz
    Dylewski, Robert
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2010, 5 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [50] Recycling of Contaminated Construction and Demolition Wood Waste
    Hille Rautkoski
    Mika Vähä-Nissi
    Kirsi Kataja
    Marie Gestranius
    Sari Liukkonen
    Marjo Määttänen
    Johanna Liukkonen
    Jarmo Kouko
    Sari Asikainen
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2016, 7 : 615 - 624