Not the Same Old Chestnut: Rewilding Forests with Biotechnology
被引:0
|
作者:
Brister, Evelyn
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Rochester Inst Technol RIT, Dept Philosophy, 92 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14620 USARochester Inst Technol RIT, Dept Philosophy, 92 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
Brister, Evelyn
[1
]
Newhouse, Andrew E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
State Univ New York Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm & Forest Biol, 1 Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USARochester Inst Technol RIT, Dept Philosophy, 92 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
Newhouse, Andrew E.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Rochester Inst Technol RIT, Dept Philosophy, 92 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
[2] State Univ New York Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm & Forest Biol, 1 Forestry Dr, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
TRANSGENIC AMERICAN CHESTNUT;
RESTORATION;
WILD;
DYNAMICS;
GROWTH;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
We argue that the wild release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) can be justified as a way of preserving species and ecosystems. We look at the case of a genetically modified American chestnut (Castanea dentata) that is currently undergoing regulatory review. Because American chestnuts are functionally extinct, a genetically modified replacement has significant conservation value. In addition, many of the arguments used against GMOs, especially GMO crops, do not hold for American chestnut trees. Finally, we show how GMOs such as the American chestnut support a reorientation of conservation values away from restoration as it has historically been interpreted, and toward an alternative framework known as rewilding.