Effect of Body Position on Energy Expenditure of Preterm Infants as Determined by Simultaneous Direct and Indirect Calorimetry

被引:5
|
作者
Bell, Edward F. [1 ]
Johnson, Karen J. [1 ]
Dove, Edwin L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Pediat, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
energy expenditure; preterm infant; direct calorimetry; indirect calorimetry; metabolism; body position; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE; PREMATURE-INFANTS; HEAT-LOSS; RESPIRATORY METABOLISM; PRONE; BALANCE; GLUCOSE; SUPINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1593476
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Indirect calorimetry is the standard method for estimating energy expenditure in clinical research. Few studies have evaluated indirect calorimetry in infants by comparing it with simultaneous direct calorimetry. Our purpose was (1) to compare the energy expenditure of preterm infants determined by these two methods, direct calorimetry and indirect calorimetry; and (2) to examine the effect of body position, supine or prone, on energy expenditure. Study Design We measured energy expenditure by simultaneous direct (heat loss by gradient-layer calorimeter corrected for heat storage) and indirect calorimetry (whole body oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production) in 15 growing preterm infants during two consecutive interfeeding intervals, once in the supine position and once in the prone position. Results The mean energy expenditure for all measurements in both positions did not differ significantly by the method used: 2.82 (standard deviation [SD] 0.42) kcal/kg/h by direct calorimetry and 2.78 (SD 0.48) kcal/kg/h by indirect calorimetry. The energy expenditure was significantly lower, by 10%, in the prone than in the supine position, whether examined by direct calorimetry (2.67 vs. 2.97 kcal/kg/h, p < 0.001) or indirect calorimetry (2.64 vs. 2.92 kcal/kg/h, p = 0.017). Conclusion Direct calorimetry and indirect calorimetry gave similar estimates of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was 10% lower in the prone position than in the supine position.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 498
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protein turnover and energy expenditure in preterm infants
    Heine, W
    Wutzke, KD
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERNAHRUNGSWISSENSCHAFT, 1997, 36 (04): : 353 - 354
  • [32] Determinants of energy expenditure in ventilated preterm infants
    DeMarie, MP
    Hoffenberg, A
    Biggerstaff, SLB
    Jeffers, BW
    Hay, WW
    Thureen, PJ
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (06) : 465 - 472
  • [33] Measuring energy expenditure in preterm and unstable infants
    Thureen, PJ
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2003, 142 (04): : 366 - 367
  • [34] DETERMINING ENERGY-EXPENDITURE IN PRETERM INFANTS - COMPARISON OF (H2O)-H-2-O-18 METHOD AND INDIRECT CALORIMETRY
    JENSEN, CL
    BUTTE, NF
    WONG, WW
    MOON, JK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 263 (03): : R685 - R692
  • [35] Accuracy and reliability of a portable indirect calorimeter compared to whole-body indirect calorimetry for measuring resting energy expenditure
    Purcell, Sarah A.
    Johnson-Stoklossa, Carlene
    Tibaes, Jenneffer Rayane Braga
    Frankish, Alena
    Elliott, Sarah A.
    Padwal, Raj
    Prado, Carla M.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2020, 39 : 67 - 73
  • [36] Measurement of Energy Expenditure in Gottingen Minipigs Using Indirect Calorimetry
    Bredum, Simon Krogh
    Jacobsen, Julie
    Lundh, Sofia
    Fredholm, Merete
    Cirera, Susanna
    Christoffersen, Berit
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 : 267 - 267
  • [37] Substrate utilization and energy expenditure pattern in sepsis by indirect calorimetry
    Li, Andrew
    Mukhopadhyay, Amartya
    CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 24 (01):
  • [38] Substrate utilization and energy expenditure pattern in sepsis by indirect calorimetry
    Andrew Li
    Amartya Mukhopadhyay
    Critical Care, 24
  • [39] INDIRECT CALORIMETRY IN THE MONITORING OF ENERGY-EXPENDITURE OF BURNED PATIENTS
    ECCLES, RC
    SWINAMER, DL
    ALTON, JDM
    KING, EG
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1986, 9 (03): : A22 - A22