Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation technologies in Lithuania

被引:142
|
作者
Streimikiene, Dalia [1 ]
Sliogeriene, Jurate [2 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [2 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Energy Inst, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-2040 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Electricity generation technologies; Scenarios; Multiple criteria analysis; AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process); ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment); Lithuanian case study; DECISION-MAKING; ENERGY; SELECTION; TOPSIS; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper presents the process of choice of electricity generation technologies, which has been solved using a case of Lithuania's power sector and such multiple criteria mathematical methods as AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment method). Having considered the impact of environment, a set of evaluation criteria was compiled for electricity generation technologies. Analysis of qualitative and quantitative criteria helped to rate the electricity generation technologies considering their economic, technological, environmental social and political aspects and rank them in order of priority. The derived results show that in case of Lithuania it is viable to consider further development of the nuclear power generation capacity. Among the electricity generation technologies related to renewable energy sources a clear priority is assigned to biomass technologies. Sensitivity analysis performed by applying multi criteria method ARAS, has confirmed this result. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 156
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria decision analysis of electricity sector transition policy in Korea
    Choi, Donghyun
    Ahn, Young-Hwan
    Choi, Dong Gu
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29
  • [22] Probabilistic multi-criteria assessment of renewable micro-generation technologies in households
    Zhang, Chonghui
    Wang, Qin
    Zeng, Shouzhen
    Balezentis, Tomas
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Alisauskaite-Seskiene, Ilona
    Chen, Xueli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 582 - 592
  • [23] A semantic multi-criteria approach to evaluate different types of energy generation technologies
    Martinez-Garcia, Miriam
    Valls, Aida
    Moreno, Antonio
    Aldea, Arantza
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 110 : 129 - 138
  • [24] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach
    Bhandari, Ramchandra
    Arce, Benjamin Eduardo
    Sessa, Vittorio
    Adamou, Rabani
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [25] Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis
    Truc T. Q. Vo
    Ao Xia
    Fionn Rogan
    David M. Wall
    Jerry D. Murphy
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2017, 19 : 689 - 703
  • [26] Sustainability assessment of large-scale storage technologies for surplus electricity using group multi-criteria decision analysis
    Vo, Truc T. Q.
    Xia, Ao
    Rogan, Fionn
    Wall, David M.
    Murphy, Jerry D.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (03) : 689 - 703
  • [27] MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF THE INTERMODAL TERMINAL TECHNOLOGIES
    Zacevic, Slobodan
    Tadic, Snezana
    Krstic, Mladen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2017, : 105 - 110
  • [28] Multi-criteria analysis for renewable energy generation: A case of Tokyo
    Fitriyana, Dinna
    Prabawati, Mutia
    Tanuwijaya, Frank
    Naimah, Dintani Y. N.
    [J]. 2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 291
  • [30] Multi-criteria analysis of two CO2 transport technologies
    Roussanaly, Simon
    Hognes, Erik S.
    Jakobsen, Jana P.
    [J]. GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2981 - 2988