Selection of Chemicals for the Development and Evaluation of In Vitro Methods for Skin Sensitisation Testing

被引:35
|
作者
Casati, Silvia [1 ]
Aeby, Pierre [2 ]
Kimber, Ian [3 ]
Maxwell, Gavin [4 ]
Ovigne, Jean Marc [5 ]
Roggen, Erwin [6 ]
Rovida, Costanza [1 ]
Tosti, Luca [1 ]
Basketter, David [7 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Hlth & Consumer Protect, In Vitro Methods Unit ECVAM, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Procter & Gamble Co Wella Cosmital, Marly, Switzerland
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Unilever, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
[5] LOreal Res, Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[6] Novozymes AS, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
[7] DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, Beds, England
来源
关键词
LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS; GUINEA-PIG; MAXIMIZATION TEST; HYPERSENSITIVITY; IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; BUEHLER;
D O I
10.1177/026119290903700313
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is a general, indeed pressing, need to develop, validate and bring into common use alternative methods to obviate the use of animals in toxicity testing. Specifically in the field of skin sensitisation, considerable investments are being made, at both the industry and university levels, in the development of alternative approaches to incorporate novel biomarkers or to enhance the functioning of existing models. In the development and/or optimisation phases of a method, the testing of reference chemicals with well characterised responses in predictive in vivo tests, would allow for an early appreciation of the utility of a method. More specifically, challenging a method with the same set of chemicals would facifitate the assessment of its possible contribution to an integrated testing approach. With such a small number of substances, the limited feasibility of fully representing the chemical and biological diversity of known chemical (skin) allergens is acknowledged. However, an attempt was made to cover, as much as possible, the range of known potencies for skin allergens, and to reflect the variety of physicochemical and reaction mechanisms involved in the sensitisation process. Furthermore, chemicals known to require biotransformation or other types of activation were included in the list, in order to evaluate the potential of the test system to detect them correctly. It is acknowledged that other chemical sets also might be appropriate for test development purposes. However, it was deemed important both to make public this recommendation and to encourage the use of a core set. It is therefore proposed that these selected substances are used as reference compounds for the primary development of new tests, or for the improvement of existing tests. In our view, a test that is able to correctly identify these chemicals should be considered very promising and worthy of further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 312
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of chemicals for the development and evaluation of in vitro methods for skin sensitisation testing
    Rovida, Costanza
    Aeby, Pierre
    Basketter, David
    Kimber, Ian
    Maxwell, Gavin
    Roggen, Erwin
    Casati, Silvia
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S92 - S93
  • [2] In vitro/in chemico skin sensitisation testing strategy: A challenge for REACH registrants
    De Smet, Liesbeth
    Bilau, Maaike
    Deleebeeck, Nele
    Jacobs, Sandy
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S258 - S259
  • [3] Limitations of in vitro/in chemico/in silico methods for skin sensitization testing of 16 chemicals in the REACH context
    Tegethoff, K.
    Beyer, D.
    Schaub, M.
    Schlecker, H.
    Bluhm, H.
    [J]. NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 391 : S82 - S82
  • [4] Testing methods and evaluation of ecotoxicological effects of chemicals
    Shigeoka, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE SCIENCE, 2000, 25 (04): : 431 - 434
  • [5] Troubleshooting methods for toxicity testing of airborne chemicals in vitro
    Bakand, Shahnaz
    Hayes, Amanda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 61 (02) : 76 - 85
  • [6] Alternative methods for skin sensitisation testing - The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 19
    deSilva, O
    Basketter, DA
    Barratt, MD
    Corsini, E
    Cronin, MTD
    Das, PK
    Degwert, J
    Enk, A
    Garrigue, JL
    Hauser, C
    Kimber, I
    Lepoittevin, JP
    Peguet, J
    Ponec, M
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 1996, 24 (05): : 683 - 705
  • [7] Implementation of in vitro methods in the safety evaluation of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals under REACH regulation
    Rovida, C.
    Locatelli, M.
    Corsini, E.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 295 : S226 - S226
  • [8] Implementation of three in-vitro test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment
    Kidd, Darren
    Rothwell, Chris
    Inns, Joseph
    Dreher, David
    Henderson, Debbie
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S261 - S261
  • [9] Can the battery of in vitro and in silico methods resolve current deadlocks with skin sensitisation?
    Sharma, A.
    Sahigara, F.
    Chesne, C.
    Bauer, F. J.
    Thomas, P.
    Genevois, C. C.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S262 - S263
  • [10] In vitro skin sensitization: Comparison of different methods and development of a reliable testing strategy
    Gehrke, H.
    Hopflinger, V.
    Huether, H. Hofman
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 258 : S144 - S145