Support for Transnational Conservation in a Gain-Loss Context

被引:5
|
作者
Vogdrup-Schmidt, Mathias [1 ,2 ]
Strange, Niels [1 ,2 ]
Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Framing effects; Loss aversion; Choice experiment; Migratory species; Cross-country collaboration; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; LOSS AVERSION; PROSPECT-THEORY; MIXED LOGIT; VALUES; PREFERENCES; BEHAVIOR; EFFICIENCY; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.026
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Efficient biodiversity conservation may rest on support for transnational cooperation; particularly for migratory species. Support for transnational conservation efforts may hinge on key issues like the potential outcomes and whether any collaboration aspect is highlighted. We designed an experiment focused on conservation of open land habitats in Denmark and the Netherlands. We tested how support of Danish households depends on framing in a context of possible losses of habitats and on possible contributions from Dutch households to the conservation case. We further tested for presence of loss aversion in outcomes and income. We found that the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for gains in open land habitats at home tended to increase when habitat losses were possible. Framing in the context of others, Dutch households, contributing consistently affected Danes' WTP for increasing protected habitat areas and for avoiding habitat losses. And the less Dutch households contributed, the more Danish households contributed with the converse also being true. Our results suggest that overall support for habitat conservation for migratory birds may be higher in cases where a risk of habitat losses exists. Results also suggest that support for conservation at home increase when respondents perceive that they share the challenge with other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 58
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AGING, GAIN-LOSS FRAMING, AND THE SUBJECTIVE VALUATION OF TECHNOLOGY
    Best, R.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 : 381 - 381
  • [22] The Influence of Counterfactual Comparison on Fairness in Gain-Loss Contexts
    Li, Qi
    Wang, Chunsheng
    Taxer, Jamie
    Yang, Zhong
    Zheng, Ya
    Liu, Xun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [23] An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory
    Wu, George
    Markle, Alex B.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (07) : 1322 - 1335
  • [24] The Effect of Gain-loss Framing on Climate Policy Preferences
    Svenningsen, Lea S.
    Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 185
  • [25] Gain-Loss Framing Enhances Mnemonic Discrimination in Preschoolers
    Ngo, Chi T.
    Newcombe, Nora S.
    Olson, Ingrid R.
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 90 (05) : 1569 - 1578
  • [26] Effects of gain-loss frames on advantageous inequality aversion
    Kene Boun My
    Nicolas Lampach
    Mathieu Lefebvre
    Jacopo Magnani
    Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2018, 4 (2) : 99 - 109
  • [27] Arc-shaped solitons on a gain-loss ring
    Huang, Changming
    Li, Chunyan
    Huang, Zhenfen
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2019, 27 (11) : 15898 - 15906
  • [28] Comparison of gain-loss asymmetry behavior for stocks and indexes
    Zaluska-Kotur, Magdalena
    Karpio, Krzysztof
    Orlowska, Arkadiusz
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2006, 37 (11): : 3187 - 3192
  • [29] The Best Gain-Loss Ratio is a Poor Performance Measure
    Biagini, Sara
    Pinar, Mustafa C.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS, 2013, 4 (01): : 228 - 242
  • [30] Gain-loss framing effects in dilemmas of trust and reciprocity
    Evans, Anthony M.
    van Beest, Ilja
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 73 : 151 - 163