A competitive and cooperative approach to propositional satisfiability

被引:12
|
作者
Inoue, Katsumi
Soh, Takehide
Ueda, Seiji
Sasaura, Yoshito
Banbara, Mutsunori
Tamura, Naoyuki
机构
[1] Natl Inst Informat, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018430, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Technol, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[4] Kobe Univ, Informat Sci & Technol Ctr, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
关键词
SAT; SAT solver; parallel execution; planning; job-shop scheduling;
D O I
10.1016/j.dam.2006.04.015
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) has attracted considerable attention recently in both Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, and a lot of algorithms have been developed for solving SAT. Each SAT solver has strength and weakness, and it is difficult to develop a universal SAT solver which can efficiently solve a wide range of SAT instances. We thus propose parallel execution of SAT solvers each of which individually solves the same SAT instance simultaneously. With this competitive approach, a variety of SAT instances can be solved efficiently in average. We then consider a cooperative method for solving SAT by exchanging lemmas derived by conflict analysis among different SAT solvers. To show the usefulness of our approach, we solve SATLIB benchmark problems, planning benchmark problems as well as the job-shop scheduling problem with good performance. The system has been implemented in Java with both systematic and stochastic solvers. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2291 / 2306
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dependent and independent variables in propositional satisfiability
    Giunchiglia, E
    Maratea, M
    Tacchella, A
    LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 8TH, 2002, 2424 : 296 - 307
  • [22] Scalable Formula Decomposition for Propositional Satisfiability
    Monnet, Anthony
    Villemaire, Roger
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD C* CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2010 (C3S2E '10), 2010, : 43 - 52
  • [23] Reducing inductive definitions to propositional satisfiability
    Pelov, N
    Ternovska, E
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3668 : 221 - 234
  • [24] Strong conflict analysis for propositional satisfiability
    Jin, HoonSang
    Somenzi, Fabio
    2006 DESIGN AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 816 - 821
  • [25] Separating signs in the propositional satisfiability problem
    Hirsch E.A.
    Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2000, 98 (4) : 442 - 463
  • [26] Answer set programming based on propositional satisfiability
    Giunchiglia, Enrico
    Lierler, Yuliya
    Maratea, Marco
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2006, 36 (04) : 345 - 377
  • [27] Answer set programming based on propositional satisfiability
    Giunchiglia, Enrico
    Lierler, Yuliya
    Maratea, Marco
    Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2006, 36 (04): : 345 - 377
  • [28] What is answer set programming to propositional satisfiability
    Lierler, Yuliya
    CONSTRAINTS, 2017, 22 (03) : 307 - 337
  • [29] Koepke Machines and Satisfiability for Infinitary Propositional Languages
    Carl, Merlin
    Loewe, Benedikt
    Rin, Benjamin G.
    UNVEILING DYNAMICS AND COMPLEXITY, CIE 2017, 2017, 10307 : 187 - 197