FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Cicciu, Marco [1 ]
Bramanti, Ennio [2 ]
Matacena, Giada [2 ]
Guglielmino, Eugenio [3 ]
Risitano, Giacomo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Sch Dent, Dept Human Pathol, I-98100 Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Sch Dent, Dept Odontostomatol, I-98100 Messina, Italy
[3] Univ Messina, Dept Elect Engn Chem & Ind Engn, I-98100 Messina, Italy
关键词
FEM analysis; bone tissue; load; dental implant; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; STRESS-ANALYSIS; DESIGNS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Prosthetic rehabilitation of partial or total edentulous patients is today a challenge for clinicians and dental practitioners. The application of dental implants in order to recover areas of missing teeth is going to be a predictable technique, however some important points about the implant angulation, the stress distribution over the bone tissue and prosthetic components should be well investigated for having final long term clinical results. Two different system of the prosthesis fixation are commonly used. The screw retained crown and the cemented retained one. All of the two restoration techniques give to the clinicians several advantages and some disadvantages. Aim of this work is to evaluate all the mechanical features of each system, through engineering systems of investigations like FEM and Von Mises analyses. The FEM is today a useful tool for the prediction of stress effect upon material and biomaterial under load or strengths. Specifically three different area has been evaluated through this study: the dental crown with the bone interface; the passant screw connection area; the occlusal surface of the two different type of crown. The elastic features of the materials used in the study have been taken from recent literature data. Results revealed an adequate response for both type of prostheses, although cemented retained one showed better results over the occlusal area.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 825
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Guided Nitinol-Retained (Smileloc) Single-Tooth Dental Restorations
    Jensen, Ole T.
    Jansen, Curtis E.
    Seo, Young
    Yellich, George
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 31 (03) : 437 - +
  • [32] An Esthetic Solution to the Screw-Retained Implant Restoration: Introduction to the Implant Crown Adhesive Plug: Clinical Report
    Wadhwani, Chandur
    Pineyro, Alfonso
    Avots, Jurijs
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 23 (03) : 138 - 143
  • [33] A comparison of torque values in cemented vs. screw-retained implant prostheses: A pilot study
    Holliday, P
    Wicks, RA
    Campbell, JC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A65 - A65
  • [34] Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results
    Claudio Cacaci
    Friederike Cantner
    Thomas Mücke
    Peter Randelzhofer
    Jan Hajtó
    Florian Beuer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2017, 21 : 1953 - 1959
  • [35] Passive fitting of a screw-retained implant sovrastructure: Evaluation of a new procedure.
    Di Lenarda, R
    Cadenaro, M
    Biasotto, M
    Bonino, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 213 - 213
  • [36] Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results
    Cacaci, Claudio
    Cantner, Friederike
    Muecke, Thomas
    Randelzhofer, Peter
    Hajto, Jan
    Beuer, Florian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (06) : 1953 - 1959
  • [37] Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections
    Piattelli, A
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Di Bonaventura, G
    Catamo, G
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (09) : 1146 - 1150
  • [38] Bacterial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections.
    Di Labio, L
    Piattelli, A
    Assenza, B
    Leghissa, GC
    Scarano, A
    Paolantonio, M
    Piccolomini, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 213 - 213
  • [39] Factors influencing success of cement versus screw-retained implant restorations: a clinical review
    Manawar, Ahmad
    Dhanasekar, B.
    Aparna, I. N.
    Naim, Hina
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2012, 4 (03) : 43 - 47
  • [40] Torque Maintenance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Anterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis with Different Abutment Angulations After Aging
    Al-Zordk, Walid
    Al-Dobaisi, Tawfik
    Ghazy, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (04) : 723 - 729