Evidence for Field Cancerization of the Prostate

被引:113
|
作者
Nonn, Larisa [1 ]
Ananthanarayanan, Vijayalakshmi [1 ]
Gann, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Pathol, Coll Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
PROSTATE | 2009年 / 69卷 / 13期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; field effects; biomarkers; PROLIFERATIVE INFLAMMATORY ATROPHY; CANCER DNA PHENOTYPE; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PROMOTER METHYLATION; EARLY IDENTIFICATION; ANTIGEN-EXPRESSION; NEGATIVE BIOPSIES; CLONAL EVOLUTION; GENE-EXPRESSION; TISSUE ADJACENT;
D O I
10.1002/pros.20983
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Field cancerization, which is not yet well-characterized in the prostate, occurs when large areas of an organ or tissue surface are affected by a carcinogenic insult, resulting in the development of multi-focal independent premalignant foci and molecular lesions that precede histological change. METHODS. Herein, we review the cumulative body of evidence concerning field effects in the prostate and critically evaluate the methods available for the identification and validation of field effect biomarkers. Validated biomarkers for field effects have an important role to play as surrogate endpoint biomarkers in Phase II prevention trials and as clinical predictors of cancer in men with negative biopsies. RESULTS. Thus far, field effects have been identified involving nuclear morphometric changes, gene expression, protein expression, gene promoter methylation, DNA damage and angiogenesis. In addition to comparing cancer-adjacent benign tissue to more distant areas or to "supernormal" tissue from cancer-free organs, investigators can use a nested case-control design for negative biopsies that offers a number of unique advantages. CONCLUSIONS. True carcinogenic field effects should be distinguished from secondary responses of the microenvironment to a developing tumor, although the latter may still lead to useful clinical prediction tools. Prostate 69: 1470-1479, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1470 / 1479
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Oral field cancerization
    Fortuna, Giulio
    Mignogna, Michele D.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 183 (14) : 1622 - 1622
  • [12] Field cancerization: Treatment
    Cornejo, Christine M.
    Jambusaria-Pahlajani, Anokhi
    Willenbrink, Tyler J.
    Schmults, Chrysalyne D.
    Arron, Sarah T.
    Ruiz, Emily S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (03) : 719 - 730
  • [13] Epigenetic field for cancerization
    Ushijima, Toshikazu
    JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 40 (02): : 142 - 150
  • [14] Field cancerization in dermatology
    Magalhaes, Renata Ferreira
    Buffo, Thais Helena
    Goncalves, Heitor de Sa
    Barcaui, Carlos Baptista
    de Moraes, Aparecida Machado
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70
  • [15] Field cancerization in dermatology
    Magalhaes, Renata Ferreira
    Buffo, Thais Helena
    Goncalves, Heitor de Sa
    Barcaui, Carlos Baptista
    de Moraes, Aparecida Machado
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 70
  • [16] Molecular evidence of field cancerization in a patient with 7 tumors of the aerodigestive tract
    van Rees, BP
    Cleton-Jansen, AM
    Cense, HA
    Polak, MM
    Clement, MJ
    Drillenburg, P
    van Lanschot, JJB
    Offerhaus, GJA
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2000, 31 (02) : 269 - 271
  • [17] A challenging case of field cancerization
    Bektas-Kayhan, K.
    Karagoz, G.
    Ozbek, C. D.
    Altun, M.
    Peterson, D. E.
    Unur, M.
    ORAL DISEASES, 2012, 18 : 43 - 43
  • [18] Refining the Classification of Field Cancerization
    Kitrell, Bo
    Crew, Ashley
    Wysong, Ashley
    Sutton, Adam
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2023, 49 (03) : 228 - 230
  • [19] An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization
    Kit Curtius
    Nicholas A. Wright
    Trevor A. Graham
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2018, 18 : 19 - 32
  • [20] A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: Evidence and clinical implications
    Braakhuis, BJM
    Tabor, MP
    Kummer, JA
    Leemans, CR
    Brakenhoff, RH
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2003, 63 (08) : 1727 - 1730