Risk-based decision-making for managing resources during the design of complex space exploration systems

被引:49
|
作者
Mehr, Ali Farhang [1 ]
Tumer, Irem Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, QSS Grp, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2205868
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Complex space exploration systems are often designed in collaborative engineering environments where requirements and design decisions by various subsystem engineers have a great impact on the overall risk of the mission. As a result, the system-level management should allocate risk mitigation resources (e.g., capital to place additional sensors or to improve the current technology) among various risk elements such that the main objectives of the system are achieved as closely as possible. Minimizing risk has been long accepted as one of the major drivers for system-level decisions and particularly resource management. In this context, Risk-Based Decision Making refers to a process that allocates resources in such a way that the expected risk of the overall system is minimized. This paper presents a new risk-based design decision-making method, referred to as Risk and Uncertainty Based Concurrent Integrated Design Methodology or RUBIC Design Methodology for short. The new approach is based on concepts from portfolio optimization theory and continuous resource management, extended to provide a mathematical rigor for risk-based decision-making during the design of complex space exploration systems. The RUBIC design method is based on the idea that a unit of resource, allocated to mitigate a certain risk in the system, contributes to the overall system risk reduction in the following two ways: (1) by mitigating that particular risk; and (2) by impacting other risk elements in the system (i.e., the correlation among various risk elements). RUBIC then provides a probabilistic framework for reducing the expected risk of the final system via optimal allocation of available risk-mitigation resources. The application of the proposed approach is demonstrated using a satellite reaction wheel example.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1022
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An applied complex systems framework for risk-based decision-making in infrastructure engineering
    Gomez, C.
    Sanchez-Silva, M.
    Duenas-Osorio, L.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2014, 50 : 66 - 77
  • [2] Risk-Based Decision Making in Complex Systems: The ALBA Method
    Colombo, Simone
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 476 - 480
  • [3] The RMP as a tool for risk-based decision-making
    Mattheissen, C
    Helsing, L
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON RISK ANALYSIS IN PROCESS SAFETY, 1997, : 341 - 347
  • [4] A novel risk-based decision-making paradigm
    Morgado, Pedro
    Marques, Fernanda
    Silva, Miguel B.
    Sousa, Nuno
    Cerqueira, Joao J.
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [5] Risk-based decision-making for infrastructure systems under extreme events
    Chen, Chuanqiang
    Li, Yaohan
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2024, 9 (10)
  • [6] Risk-Based Decision Making in IoT Systems
    Blinowski, Grzegorz J.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, PT I, 2018, 655 : 230 - 241
  • [7] More Regulators Rely on Risk-Based Decision-Making
    Prabhakaran, Vidhya
    POWER, 2016, 160 (11) : 20 - 20
  • [8] RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING BY MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE TEACHERS
    Pratt, Dave
    Levinson, Ralph
    Kent, Phillip
    Yogui, Cristina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME 7), 2011, : 875 - 884
  • [9] Risk-based decision-making systems in water and food security of global drylands
    Wang, Manman
    Du, Yiming
    Jiang, Tianlong
    WATER SUPPLY, 2023, 23 (05) : 2224 - 2232
  • [10] GROUP OFFERS RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING REFORMS
    EMBER, L
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1993, 71 (29) : 30 - 31