Neonatal Screening: Cost-utility Analysis for Galactosemia

被引:0
|
作者
Hatam, Nahid [1 ]
Askarian, Mehrdad [2 ]
Shirvani, Samad [3 ]
Siavashi, Elham [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Informat Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Community Med, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Res Comm, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Economic evaluation; Cost-utility analysis; Newborn screening; Galactosemia; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; NEWBORN; PROGRAM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Galactosemia is a congenital metabolic disorder that can damage the health of a newborn. Screening is an important step to prevent and treat this condition. Due to increasing health care costs and limited financial resources of health systems, the most suitable economic analysis tool should be applied. The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-utility of neonatal screening program for diagnosing galactosemia in Fars province, Iran. Methods: In this cross-sectional study and cost-utility analysis in the cost of screening for galactosemia and its financial effects, decision tree model and society's viewpoint were used. The population of study was 81837 infants referred to Neonatal Screening Laboratory (Nader Kazemi Clinic) affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Iran, in 2010. Quality of life in two groups of patients was evaluated by using the time trade-off. The best intervention option was selected by using the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio. Results: The estimated cost of diagnosed through screening and without screening were 43519911 and 130011168 Iranian Rails (4222.00 $ and 12615.00 $), respectively. Therefore, there was a saving of 201443240.99 Iranian Rails (19641.00 $), for each patient annually. Conclusion: The screening program can improve both the qualitative and quantitative lifestyle of people and increase savings in health care system. Policymakers could use the results to design new policies based on the necessity of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS AND PHYSICAL THERAPY
    KARHAUSEN, R
    WEBERFALKENSAMMER, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 1982, 41 (04): : 183 - 183
  • [42] Cost-utility analysis of bariatric surgery
    Borisenko, O.
    Lukyanov, V.
    Ahmed, A. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (10) : 1328 - 1337
  • [43] Cost-Utility Analysis in Probabilistic Models
    Baier, Christel
    2016 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (TASE), 2016, : 1 - 1
  • [44] Cost-utility analysis of taxane therapy
    Yee, GC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997, 54 : S11 - S15
  • [45] Standardizing cost-utility analysis in neurosurgery
    Ament, Jared D.
    Kim, Kee D.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (01)
  • [46] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
    SIMOONS, ML
    VOS, J
    MARTENS, LL
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 12 (06) : 694 - 699
  • [47] Patient preferences and cost-utility analysis
    Elnitsky, CA
    Stone, P
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (02) : 74 - 76
  • [48] Condom distribution: a cost-utility analysis
    Bedimo, AL
    Pinkerton, SD
    Cohen, DA
    Gray, B
    Farley, TA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2002, 13 (06) : 384 - 392
  • [49] USE OF THE EUROQOL IN COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
    DECHARRO, F
    VANBUSSCHBACH, J
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (01) : 51 - 51
  • [50] Cost-utility analysis of screening high-risk groups for anal cancer
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Jones, Roy
    Czoski-Murray, Carolyn
    Srnith, Kevin J.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 30 (03) : 293 - 304