Dental plaque removal with a novel battery-powered toothbrush

被引:0
|
作者
Biesbrock, AR
Walters, P
Bartizek, RD
Ruhlman, D
Donly, KJ
机构
[1] Procter & Gamble Co, Hlth Care Res Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45040 USA
[2] Ruhlman Clin Resources, Eugene, OR USA
[3] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat Dent, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2002年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose : To compare the plaque removal efficacy of a positive control power toothbrush (Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover) to an experimental power toothbrush (Crest SpinBrush) following a single use. Materials and Methods: This study was a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 2-period crossover design which examined plaque removal with the two toothbrushes following a single use in 38 completed subjects. Plaque was scored before and after brushing using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Index. Results: Baseline plaque scores were 1.89 and 1.91 for the experimental toothbrush and control toothbrush treatment groups, respectively. With respect to all surfaces examined, the experimental toothbrush delivered an adjusted (via analysis of covariance) mean difference between baseline and post-brushing plaque scores of 0.46 while the control toothbrush delivered an adjusted mean difference of 0.45. These results were not statistically significant (P=0.645). A 95% one-sided upper confidence limit on the Ultra Plaque Remover minus SpinBrush difference in amount of plaque removed was calculated as 9.4% of the Ultra Plaque Remover adjusted mean. A common criterion for what is known as an "at least as good as" test is that the 95% one-sided confidence limit on the product difference is below 10% of the control product mean. Using this criterion, the SpinBrush is at least as good as the Oral-B Ultra Plaque Remover. With respect to buccal and lingual surfaces, the experimental toothbrush delivered very similar results relative to the control toothbrush. These results were also not statistically significant (P > 0.564).
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 80
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Battery Powered and Manual Toothbrush in Removal of a Dental Plaque for Good Oral Hygiene in Adolesents with Over-weight
    Orbak, Recep
    Orbak, Zerrin
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2018, 90 : 354 - 354
  • [12] HOW TO DO IT - A MODIFIED BATTERY-POWERED TOOTHBRUSH FOR CORONARY-ARTERY ENDARTERECTOMY
    IZZAT, MB
    ANGELINI, GD
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 34 (06): : 527 - 528
  • [13] Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated toothbrush compared to a manual toothbrush
    Ruhlman, CD
    Bartizek, RD
    Biesbrock, AR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 (04): : 191 - 194
  • [14] Efficacy of plaque removal and learning effect of a powered and a manual toothbrush
    Lazarescu, D
    Boccaneala, S
    Illiescu, A
    De Boever, JA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 30 (08) : 726 - 731
  • [15] Safety and plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush
    Sharma, NC
    Galustians, HJ
    Qaqish, J
    Cugini, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 : 9B - 12B
  • [16] THE BATTERY-POWERED BULLET
    Mone, Gregory
    SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2013, 308 (02) : 56 - 61
  • [17] BATTERY-POWERED CARS
    不详
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 1966, 45 (11): : 17 - &
  • [18] Battery-powered equipment
    Pritchard, C
    ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (03) : 285 - 285
  • [19] Battery-powered backup
    LEED AP
    不详
    Consult Specif Eng, 2006, 6 (18-22):
  • [20] Battery-powered cart
    不详
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 1999, 123 (02): : 178 - 178