An Assessment of Conventional and Conservation Tillage Systems in Terms of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Corn Production

被引:0
|
作者
Ozturk, H. Huseyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Agr Engn Agr Machineries & Technol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
来源
AMA-AGRICULTURAL MECHANIZATION IN ASIA AFRICA AND LATIN AMERICA | 2019年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
Corn; Tillage systems; Reduced tillage; CO2; emissions; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; 2ND CROP CORN; ENERGY USE; FARMING SYSTEMS; SOIL; CULTIVATION; INPUTS; REQUIREMENTS; AGRICULTURE; SILAGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to investigate the fuel consumption with the adoption of reduced tillage and the effect in crop yield and to evaluate carbon dioxide emissions for the different tillage systems in corn cultivation. Minimum tillage with stubble (MTS), minimum tillage without stubble (MT), conventional tillage with stubble (CTS) and conventional tillage without stubble (CT) were tested for seed bed preparation. The fuel consumption of CTS was 21.5 L higher per hectares than that of CT. The total CO2 emissions were 69.59 kgCO(2)/ha, 64.81 kgCO(2)/ha, 140.63 kgCO(2)/ha and 82.17 kgCO(2)/ha for MTS, MT, CTS and CT, respectively. The total energy consumptions for MTS, MT, CTS and CT were 0.95 GJ/ha, 0.89 GJ/ha, 1.91 GJ/ha and 1.13 GJ/ha, respectively. The values of specific fuel consumption were 3.44 L/t, 2.85 L/t and 6.25 L/t and 3.37 L/t for the for MTS, MT, CTS and CT, respectively. The values of specific CO2 emissions were 9.66 kgCO(2)/t, 8.03 kgCO(2)/t, 17.37 kgCO(2)/t and 9.59 kgCO(2)/t for MTS, MT, CTS and CT, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 18
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conservation tillage in US corn production: An economic appraisal.
    Day, J
    Sandretto, C
    McBride, WD
    Breneman, VE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (05) : 1205 - 1205
  • [32] SOIL MICROARTHROPODS IN LONG-TERM NO-TILLAGE AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE CORN PRODUCTION
    WINTER, JP
    VORONEY, RP
    AINSWORTH, DA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (04) : 641 - 653
  • [33] FUEL CONSUMPTION-DERIVED CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS UNDER TRADITIONAL AND NO-TILLAGE SYSTEMS IN WHEAT PRODUCTION FOR FOOD INDUSTRY
    Antmen, Z. Figen
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (04): : 2483 - 2494
  • [34] EFFECT OF CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON CORN ROOT-GROWTH
    HILFIKER, RE
    LOWERY, B
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1988, 12 (03): : 269 - 283
  • [35] Conservation tillage is compatible with manure injection in corn silage systems
    Battaglia, Martin L.
    Ketterings, Quirine M.
    Godwin, Gregory
    Czymmek, Karl J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (03) : 2900 - 2912
  • [36] EVALUATION OF CORN GROWTH AND PRODUCTIVITY WITH 3 CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    ALDARBY, AM
    LOWERY, B
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (05) : 901 - 907
  • [37] Conservation tillage systems for processing tomato production
    Thomas, R
    O'Sullivan, J
    Hamill, A
    Swanton, CJ
    HORTSCIENCE, 2001, 36 (07) : 1264 - 1268
  • [38] Carbon dioxide emissions after application of tillage systems for a dark red latosol in southern Brazil
    La Scala, N
    Lopes, A
    Marques, J
    Pereira, GT
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2001, 62 (3-4): : 163 - 166
  • [39] A global dataset for crop production under conventional tillage and no tillage systems
    Yang Su
    Benoit Gabrielle
    David Makowski
    Scientific Data, 8
  • [40] Conservation soybean production systems in the mid-southern USA: I. Transitioning from conventional to conservation tillage
    Bryant, C. J.
    Krutz, L. J.
    Reynolds, D. B.
    Locke, M. A.
    Golden, B. R.
    Irby, T.
    Steinriede, R. W., Jr.
    Spencer, G. D.
    Mills, B. E.
    Wood, C. W.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 6 (01)