Transport Disc Distraction Osteogenesis for the Reconstruction of a Calvarial Defect

被引:5
|
作者
Hong, Jong Won [1 ]
Song, Seung Yong [1 ]
Woo, Dae Gon [2 ]
Kim, Han Sung [2 ]
Hong, Hyun Joon [1 ]
Choi, Joong Ho [3 ]
Park, Beyoung Yun [1 ]
Kim, Yong Oock [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Human Tissue Restorat, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Seoul Plast Surg Clin, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Transport disc; distraction osteogenesis; calvarial bone; BONE DEFECTS; REGENERATION; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a2e05b
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Reconstruction of bone defects is possible through distraction osteogenesis using small bone transport discs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of transport disc distraction osteogenesis (TDDO) in the reconstruction of skull defects in an animal experiment. Methods: Eleven mongrel female dogs were used. Craniectomy (33 x 15 mm) was performed on both sides of the parietal bone symmetrically. On the experimental site, the 7 x 15-mm transport bone disc was used for TDDO. The control site was left in the defect state. An external distraction device was used. The latency period was 5 days, the rate of distraction was 1 mm/d, and distraction was done for 26 days. After a 6-month consolidation period, a computed tomographic scan was performed. The area of regenerated bone was measured from the computed tomographic scan. The hardness was checked on the regenerated bone and the normal bone. A histologic examination of the regenerated bone was done. Result: Eight cases were included in the evaluation, and 3 cases were excluded because they showed early escape of the distraction device. The mean (SD) area of the regenerated bone was 57.1% (26.3) in the experimental site and 41.8% (21.3) in the control site, which was not a statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean (SD) hardness was 0.50 (0.17) MPa in the experiment site and 0.55 (0.29) MPa in the normal calvarial bone; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). On histologic examination, membranous ossification was found in the regenerated bone in the experimental site. Conclusions: Transport disc distraction osteogenesis can induce new bone formation with hardness comparable to that of a normal bone. However, the amount of regenerated bone is not sufficient to allow TDDO to be substituted for conventional autogenous bone grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 796
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transport Disc Distraction Osteogenesis for the Reconstruction of a Calvarial Defect
    Yun, In Sik
    Mun, Hye Young
    Hong, Jong Won
    Cho, Eul Je
    Woo, Dae Gon
    Kim, Han Sung
    Kim, Yong Oock
    Park, Be-young Yun
    Rah, Dong Kyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (02) : 690 - 693
  • [2] Reconstruction of maxillectomy defect by transport distraction osteogenesis
    Cheung, LK
    Zhang, Q
    Zhang, ZG
    Wong, MCM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 32 (05) : 515 - 522
  • [3] Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in the Reconstruction of Pediatric Posttraumatic Calvarial Defects
    Elbanoby, Tarek
    Aly, Caber M.
    Abdelfattah, Usama
    Choi, Jong-Woo
    Power, Hollie A.
    Fattah, Yasser A. Abd El
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (05) : 2201
  • [4] Transport Distraction Osteogenesis With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 for Large Calvarial Defect Reconstruction
    Song, Seung Yong
    Yun, In Sik
    Kim, Chung Hun
    Woo, Dae Gon
    Kim, Yong Oock
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (02) : 502 - 508
  • [5] Transport disc distraction osteogenesis as an alternative protocol for mandibular reconstruction
    Kim, Soung Min
    Park, Jung Min
    Myoung, Hoon
    Lee, Jong Ho
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2010, 63 (08): : E644 - E646
  • [6] Transport distraction osteogenesis for the reconstruction of calvarial bone defects using an internal distraction device: An experimental study
    Honda, T.
    Kobayashi, S.
    Kashiwa, K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2006, : 29 - +
  • [7] Current status of transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction
    Sacco, Assuntina G.
    Chepeha, Douglas B.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (04): : 323 - 330
  • [8] Experience with Mandibular Reconstruction Using Transport-Disc-Distraction Osteogenesis
    Pingarron-Martin, Lorena
    Gonzalez Otero, T.
    Arias Gallo, L. J.
    [J]. CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2015, 8 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [9] Mandibular transport disc distraction osteogenesis
    Chepeha, D. B.
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, : 15 - 15
  • [10] Reconstruction of a Post Traumatic Anterior Maxillary Defect by Transport Distraction Osteogenesis
    Rajkumar K.
    Neelakandan R.S.
    Devadoss P.
    Bandyopadhyay T.K.
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2017, 16 (1) : 118 - 122