Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of faecal incontinence - mid- term results: is retreatment required?

被引:11
|
作者
de la Portilla, F. [1 ]
Laporte, M. [1 ]
Maestre, M. V. [1 ]
Diaz-Pavon, J. M. [1 ]
Gollonet, J. L. [1 ]
Palacios, C. [1 ]
Vazquez-Monchul, J. M. [1 ]
Garcia-Cabrera, A. M. [1 ]
Jimenez-Rodriguez, R. M. [1 ]
Sanchez Gil, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio CSIC Univ Sevilla, Unidad Gest Clin Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digestivo, Inst Biomed Sevilla IBIS, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
Neuromodulation; faecal incontinence; treatment; PERIPHERAL NEUROMODULATION; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1111/codi.12539
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimPosterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged in recent years as a therapy for faecal incontinence. Its long-term effectiveness is yet to be established, along with what the form of retreatment should be in the event of loss of effectiveness. The present study aimed to establish the mid-term results to identify the proportion of patients who may need further treatment, and if so when. MethodA prospective study including 30 patients was conducted at an academic hospital. The patients underwent 12 weekly outpatient treatment sessions, each lasting 30min (first PTNS phase). Neuromodulation was discontinued in those patients who did not have a 40% decrease in their pretreatment Wexner score. Patients having a better than 40% response were offered another 12-week course of complete treatment (second PTNS phase), following which they received no further PTNS treatment (phase without PTNS) but were assessed at 6months and 2years. ResultsAll patients finished the first phase and 22/30 patients continued to the second phase. During this phase 11 patients showed an improved Wexner score (baseline/first phase/second phase: 14.34.2 vs 9.9 +/- 5.4 vs 6.8 +/- 5.4). After a 6-month period without any treatment, the score was still improved in 11/30 patients (9.1 +/- 6.2). At 2years there was improvement in 16/30 patients (8.8 +/- 7.1). There was a significant improvement in three variables of the quality of life questionnaire: lifestyle, coping behaviour and embarrassment. ConclusionThe response to first and second phase PTNS was maintained for up to 2years. Retreatment was not required in about half of patients, even when they had finished the treatment 6months or 2years previously.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 310
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) for double urinary and faecal incontinence
    Craig, H.
    Khunda, A.
    Anderson, C.
    Ballard, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 183 - 183
  • [32] Sacral nerve neuromodulation as primary treatment for faecal incontinence with disrupted anal sphincters: Medium and long-term results
    Maslekar, Sushil K.
    Gardiner, Angela B.
    Duthie, Graeme S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (04) : A728 - A728
  • [33] Double-blind randomised controlled trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: CONtrol of Faecal Incontinence using Distal NeuromodulaTion (the CONFIDeNT trial)
    Horrocks, Emma J.
    Bremner, Stephen A.
    Stevens, Natasha
    Norton, Christine
    Gilbert, Deborah
    O'Connell, P. Ronan
    Eldridge, Sandra
    Knowles, Charles H.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (77) : 1 - +
  • [34] Posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of urge incontinence
    Vandoninck, V
    van Balken, MR
    Agrò, EF
    Petta, F
    Caltagirone, C
    Heesakkers, JPFA
    Kiemeney, LALM
    Debruyne, FMJ
    Bemelmans, BLH
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2003, 22 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [35] DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF FAECAL INCONTINENCE IN ADULTS
    Horrocks, E.
    Bremner, S. A.
    Stevens, N.
    Norton, C.
    O'Connell, P. R.
    Eldridge, S.
    Knowles, C. H.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A4 - A4
  • [36] PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION HAS SUSTAINED BENEFIT IN THE TREATMENT OF FAECAL INCONTINENCE AT 12 MONTHS.
    Cowley, J.
    Waudby, P.
    O'Grady, H.
    Duthie, G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (05) : E114 - E115
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
    Hounsome, Natalia
    Roukas, Chris
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 11
  • [38] Results of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) In Treating Urge Faecal Incontinence-Single Center Experience
    Abd Elwahab, S.
    Majeed, M.
    Waters, P.
    Hannon, M.
    McCourt, M.
    Andrews, E.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S391 - S391
  • [39] Long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and a new approach for partial responders
    M. Bosch-Ramírez
    L. Sánchez-Guillén
    M. J. Alcaide-Quirós
    M. M. Aguilar-Martínez
    M. Bellón-López
    A. López Delgado
    F. López-Rodríguez-Arias
    A. Muñoz-Duyos
    X. Barber-Valles
    A. Arroyo
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023, 27 : 443 - 451
  • [40] Long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and a new approach for partial responders
    Bosch-Ramirez, M.
    Sanchez-Guillen, L.
    Alcaide-Quiros, M. J.
    Aguilar-Martinez, M. M.
    Bellon-Lopez, M.
    Lopez Delgado, A.
    Lopez-Rodriguez-Arias, F.
    Munoz-Duyos, A.
    Barber-Valles, X.
    Arroyo, A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (06) : 443 - 451