Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of faecal incontinence - mid- term results: is retreatment required?

被引:11
|
作者
de la Portilla, F. [1 ]
Laporte, M. [1 ]
Maestre, M. V. [1 ]
Diaz-Pavon, J. M. [1 ]
Gollonet, J. L. [1 ]
Palacios, C. [1 ]
Vazquez-Monchul, J. M. [1 ]
Garcia-Cabrera, A. M. [1 ]
Jimenez-Rodriguez, R. M. [1 ]
Sanchez Gil, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio CSIC Univ Sevilla, Unidad Gest Clin Cirugia Gen & Aparato Digestivo, Inst Biomed Sevilla IBIS, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
Neuromodulation; faecal incontinence; treatment; PERIPHERAL NEUROMODULATION; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1111/codi.12539
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimPosterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged in recent years as a therapy for faecal incontinence. Its long-term effectiveness is yet to be established, along with what the form of retreatment should be in the event of loss of effectiveness. The present study aimed to establish the mid-term results to identify the proportion of patients who may need further treatment, and if so when. MethodA prospective study including 30 patients was conducted at an academic hospital. The patients underwent 12 weekly outpatient treatment sessions, each lasting 30min (first PTNS phase). Neuromodulation was discontinued in those patients who did not have a 40% decrease in their pretreatment Wexner score. Patients having a better than 40% response were offered another 12-week course of complete treatment (second PTNS phase), following which they received no further PTNS treatment (phase without PTNS) but were assessed at 6months and 2years. ResultsAll patients finished the first phase and 22/30 patients continued to the second phase. During this phase 11 patients showed an improved Wexner score (baseline/first phase/second phase: 14.34.2 vs 9.9 +/- 5.4 vs 6.8 +/- 5.4). After a 6-month period without any treatment, the score was still improved in 11/30 patients (9.1 +/- 6.2). At 2years there was improvement in 16/30 patients (8.8 +/- 7.1). There was a significant improvement in three variables of the quality of life questionnaire: lifestyle, coping behaviour and embarrassment. ConclusionThe response to first and second phase PTNS was maintained for up to 2years. Retreatment was not required in about half of patients, even when they had finished the treatment 6months or 2years previously.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 310
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mid-term outcome of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve stimulation treating faecal incontinence
    Delgadillo, Xavier
    Gaspar, Tunde
    Beurret, Lena
    Wuethrich, Philippe
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152 : 24S - 24S
  • [2] Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation - a potential treatment for faecal incontinence?
    Findlay, John M.
    Yeung, Justin M. C.
    Robinson, Rachel
    Greaves, Helen
    Maxwell-Armstrong, Charles
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (05) : 385 - 390
  • [3] PERCUTANEUOS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT IDIOPATHIC FAECAL INCONTINENCE: MID-TERM RESULTS
    Inviati, A.
    Scerrino, G.
    Di Giovanni, S.
    Schifano, D.
    Mazzola, S.
    Bonventre, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 : E172 - E172
  • [4] Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    E. Peña Ros
    P. A. Parra Baños
    J. A. Benavides Buleje
    J. M. Muñoz Camarena
    C. Escamilla Segade
    M. F. Candel Arenas
    F. M. Gonzalez Valverde
    A. Albarracín Marín-Blázquez
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2016, 20 : 19 - 24
  • [5] Short-term outcome of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    Pena Ros, E.
    Parra Banos, P. A.
    Benavides Buleje, J. A.
    Munoz Camarena, J. M.
    Escamilla Segade, C.
    Candel Arenas, M. F.
    Gonzalez Valverde, F. M.
    Albarracin Marin-Blazquez, A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [6] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence
    Wolff, K.
    Gingert, C.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 37 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [7] IS POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR FAECAL INCONTINENCE?
    Nicholson, J.
    Pearson, J.
    Molyneux, C.
    Telford, K.
    Sharma, A.
    Kiff, E.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A381 - A381
  • [8] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation - A new treatment for faecal incontinence
    Gingert, C.
    Wolff, K.
    Grubel-Krieger, C.
    Borovicka, J.
    Beutner, U.
    Hetzer, F. H.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2010, 140 : 5S - 5S
  • [9] Effect on anal pressure of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
    Lopez-Delgado, A.
    Arroyo, A.
    Ruiz-Tovar, J.
    Alcaide, M. J.
    Diez, M.
    Moya, P.
    Santos, J.
    Calpena, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (07) : 533 - 537
  • [10] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence
    Wexner, Steven D.
    LANCET, 2015, 386 (10004): : 1605 - 1606