Court Curbing in the State House: Why State Legislators Attack Their Courts

被引:4
|
作者
Blackley, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buffalo, Dept Polit Sci, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
Court curbing; state courts; legitimacy; judicial independence; JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE; SUPREME COURTS; BILL SPONSORSHIP; DEATH-PENALTY; REPRESENTATION; CHALLENGES; DEFERENCE; DYNAMICS; OPINION;
D O I
10.1080/0098261X.2019.1650678
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Legislative proposals that attack or curb state supreme courts are often introduced in state legislatures. However, the causes of state court curbing legislation have not been systematically analyzed. This article seeks to expand on existing knowledge of court curbing by examining what causes some U.S. state legislators to introduce court curbing bills. I develop a theoretical argument that court curbing is driven by court-legislator ideological distance and legislator electoral security. I demonstrate that legislators who are ideologically distant from their state supreme court and electorally secure introduce the most court curbing legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 285
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条