Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants

被引:0
|
作者
Brown, RJ [1 ]
Candy, TR [1 ]
Norcia, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Smith Kettlewell Eye Res Inst, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To examine the development of rivalry, dichoptic masking, and binocular interactions in infants more than 5 months of age using the visual evoked potential (VEP). METHODS, VEPs were recorded in 35 infants between 5 and 15 months of age and 23 adults between 13 and 59 years of age. Counterphasing, sinusoidal, 1 cycle/deg gratings were presented dichoptically. Responses from each eye were isolated by "tagging" each half-image with a different temporal frequency (5 or 7.5 Hz). Observers were presented with fixed 80% contrast gratings in each eye in experiment 1. Rivalry was detected on the basis of a negative correlation between the simultaneously measured response amplitudes at the second harmonics of the two eye-tagging frequencies, in a second analysis of the same data, response amplitudes recorded-under dichoptic viewing conditions were compared to those obtained in a monocular control condition (dichoptic masking). In experiment 2, a 40% fixed-contrast grating was presented to one eye, whereas the other eye viewed a grating that was swept in contrast from 1% to 67%. Dichoptic masking was measured as the reduction in the fixed-grating response caused by the variable contrast grating. RESULTS. Experiment 1: although adults showed evidence of VEP amplitude alternations between the eyes for cross-oriented half-images (physiological rivalry), infants did not. This immature response to rivalrous stimuli occurred despite the presence of responses at nonlinear combination frequencies recorded with gratings of the same orientation in each eye, a definitive indication of binocular interaction. In addition, both iso- and cross-oriented half-images produced less dichoptic mashing in infants than in adults in this experiment. Experiment 2. dichoptic masking in the infants was equivalent to that seen in adults with parallel gratings in the two eyes; however, masking with cross-oriented configurations was approximately five times weaker in the infants relative to the adults. CONCLUSIONS. The authors have identified a set of stimulus conditions under which infants between 5 and 15 months of age fail to demonstrate physiological rivalry despite the presence of binocular interactions. The observed lack of binocular rivalry may be the result of a specific immaturity in dichoptic, cross-orientation suppression.
引用
收藏
页码:3324 / 3333
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Binocular contrast interactions: Dichoptic masking is not a single process
    Baker, Daniel H.
    Meese, Tim S.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (24) : 3096 - 3107
  • [42] Monocular and dichoptic masking effects on the frequency doubling illusion
    Quaid, PT
    Simpson, T
    Flanagan, JG
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 : U7 - U7
  • [43] The Orientation Selectivity of Dichoptic Masking Suppression is Contrast Dependent in Amblyopia
    Gong, Ling
    Wei, Lili
    Yu, Xi
    Reynaud, Alexandre
    Hess, Robert F.
    Zhou, Jiawei
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (06)
  • [44] INTERACTION BETWEEN ROD AND CONE SYSTEMS IN DICHOPTIC VISUAL MASKING
    FOSTER, DH
    MASON, RJ
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1977, 4 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [45] Monoptic and dichoptic cross-orientation masking are not the same mechanism
    Baker, DH
    Meese, TS
    PERCEPTION, 2006, 35 (03) : 421 - 421
  • [46] BINOCULAR-RIVALRY OCCURS WITHOUT SIMULTANEOUS PRESENTATION OF DICHOPTIC STIMULI
    OSHEA, RP
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 15 (02) : 283 - 283
  • [47] DICHOPTIC TEMPORAL FREQUENCY DIFFERENCES DO NOT LEAD TO BINOCULAR-RIVALRY
    OSHEA, RP
    BLAKE, R
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 39 (01): : 59 - 63
  • [48] Asymmetric Dichoptic Masking in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys
    Shooner, Christopher
    Hallum, Luke E.
    Kumbhani, Romesh D.
    Garcia-Marin, Virginia
    Kelly, Jenna G.
    Majaj, Najib J.
    Movshon, J. Anthony
    Kiorpes, Lynne
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 37 (36): : 8734 - 8741
  • [49] CENTER SURROUND INTERACTIONS IN BINOCULAR-RIVALRY BETWEEN DICHOPTIC MOTION SIGNALS
    AIBA, TS
    BLAKE, R
    FUKUDA, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 1189 - 1189
  • [50] LOSS OF WAVELENGTH SELECTIVITY IN CONTOUR MASKING AND AFTEREFFECT FOLLOWING DICHOPTIC ADAPTATION
    BROERSE, J
    OVER, R
    LOVEGROVE, W
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1975, 17 (04): : 333 - 336