Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data

被引:299
|
作者
Arts, R
Eiken, O
Chadwick, A
Zweigel, P
van der Meer, L
Zinszner, B
机构
[1] TNO Natl Geol Survey, Netherlands Inst Appl Geosci, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] STATOIL, Ctr Res & Dev, NO-7005 Trondheim, Norway
[3] British Geol Survey, Kingsley Dunham Ctr, Keyworth NG12 5GG, Notts, England
[4] SINTEF Petr Res, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[5] Inst Francais Petr, F-92852 Rueil Malmaison, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.072
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Since October 1996, Statoil and its Sleipner partners have injected CO2 into a saline aquifer, the Utsira Sand, at a depth of approximately 1000 in. The aquifer has a thickness of more than 200 in near the injection site and is sealed by thick shales. A multi-institutional research project SACS (Saline Aquifer CO2 Storage) was formed to predict and monitor the migration of the injected CO2. To this end two time-lapse seismic surveys over the injection area have been acquired, one in October 1999, after 2.35 million tonnes Of CO2 had been injected, and the second in October 2001, after approximately 4.26 million tonnes of CO2 had been injected. Comparison with the baseline seismic survey of 1994 prior to injection provides insights into the migration of the CO2. In this paper the results of the seismic interpretation will be shown, supported by synthetic seismic modelling and reservoir flow simulation of the migrating CO2 at the two different time-steps. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1392
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A tutorial on time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring
    不详
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 49 (05): : 473 - &
  • [32] DeepNRMS: Unsupervised deep learning for noise-robust CO2 monitoring in time-lapse seismic images
    Park, Min Jun
    Frigerio, Julio
    Clapp, Bob
    Biondi, Biondo
    GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 89 (04) : IM1 - IM11
  • [33] Minimal-effort time-lapse seismic monitoring: Exploiting the relationship between acquisition and imaging in time-lapse data
    Houston, Louis M.
    Kinsland, Gary L.
    Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 1998, 17 (10): : 1440 - 1443
  • [34] Assessing the seismic AVA detectability of CO2 storage sites using novel time-lapse attributes
    Jafargandomi, Arash
    Curtis, Andrew
    PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2013, 19 (04) : 357 - 374
  • [35] Stochastic inversion method of time-lapse controlled source electromagnetic data for CO2 plume monitoring
    Ayani, Mohit
    Grana, Dario
    Liu, Mingliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 100 (100)
  • [36] Time-lapse seismic data reconstruction using compressive sensing
    Zhang, Mengli
    GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (05) : P37 - P48
  • [37] Time-lapse pre-stack seismic data registration and inversion for CO2 sequestration study at Cranfield
    Zhang, Rui
    Song, Xiaolei
    Fomel, Sergey
    Sen, Mrinal K.
    Srinivasan, Sanjay
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2014, 62 (05) : 1028 - 1039
  • [38] Monitoring CO2 saturation using time-lapse amplitude versus offset analysis of 3D seismic data from the Ketzin CO2 storage pilot site, Germany
    Ivandic, Monika
    Bergmann, Peter
    Kummerow, Juliane
    Huang, Fei
    Juhlin, Christopher
    Lueth, Stefan
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2018, 66 (08) : 1568 - 1585
  • [39] Data-assimilated time-lapse visco-acoustic full-waveform inversion: Theory and application for injected CO2 plume monitoring
    Huang, Chao
    Zhu, Tieyuan
    Xing, Guangchi
    GEOPHYSICS, 2023, 88 (01) : R105 - R120
  • [40] A methodology for 7D warping and deformation monitoring using time-lapse seismic data
    Hall, Stephen A.
    GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (04) : O21 - O31