THE TEN COMMANDMENTS FOR OPTIMIZING VALUE-AT-RISK AND DAILY CAPITAL CHARGES

被引:25
|
作者
McAleer, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Tinbergen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Daily capital charges; Excessive risk taking; Market risk; Risk management; Value-at-risk; Violations; AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; MULTIVARIATE STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY; ASYMPTOTIC THEORY; GARCH MODEL; GENERALIZED ARCH; INDEX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00588.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Credit risk is the most important type of risk in terms of monetary value. Another key risk measure is market risk, which is concerned with stocks and bonds, and related financial derivatives, as well as exchange rates and interest rates. This paper is concerned with market risk management and monitoring under the Basel II Accord, and presents Ten Commandments for optimizing value-at-risk (VaR) and daily capital charges, based on choosing wisely from (1) conditional, stochastic and realized volatility; (2) symmetry, asymmetry and leverage; (3) dynamic correlations and dynamic covariances; (4) single index and portfolio models; (5) parametric, semi-parametric and non-parametric models; (6) estimation, simulation and calibration of parameters; (7) assumptions, regularity conditions and statistical properties; (8) accuracy in calculating moments and forecasts; (9) optimizing threshold violations and economic benefits; and (10) optimizing private and public benefits of risk management. For practical purposes, it is found that the Basel II Accord would seem to encourage excessive risk taking at the expense of providing accurate measures and forecasts of risk and VaR.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 849
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using extreme value theory to measure value-at-risk for daily electricity spot prices
    Chan, F
    Gray, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2006, 22 (02) : 283 - 300
  • [22] A SEQUENTIAL ELIMINATION APPROACH TO VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK SELECTION
    Hepworth, Adam J.
    Atkinson, Michael P.
    Szechtman, Roberto
    [J]. 2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2324 - 2335
  • [23] Analytical method for computing stressed value-at-risk with conditional value-at-risk
    Hong, KiHoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2017, 19 (03): : 85 - 106
  • [24] The Ten Commandments of risk based process safety
    Rosen, Robert
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2015, 34 (03) : 212 - 213
  • [25] Do hedge funds have enough capital? A value-at-risk approach
    Gupta, A
    Liang, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) : 219 - 253
  • [26] On Optimizing the Conditional Value-at-Risk of a Maximum Cost for Risk-Averse Safety Analysis
    Chapman, Margaret P. P.
    Fauss, Michael
    Smith, Kevin M. M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2023, 68 (06) : 3720 - 3727
  • [27] A GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF IMPORTANCE SAMPLING FOR VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK
    Sun, Lihua
    Hong, L. Jeff
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC 2009 ), VOL 1-4, 2009, : 415 - 422
  • [28] Do Daily Dividends Reduce Stock Return Volatility and Value-at-Risk?
    Siddikee, Md. Noman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRIVATE EQUITY, 2018, 21 (04): : 75 - 85
  • [29] MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF VALUE-AT-RISK, CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK AND THEIR SENSITIVITIES
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Liu, Guangwu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2011, : 95 - 107
  • [30] Quantifying market risk with Value-at-Risk or Expected Shortfall? - Consequences for capital requirements and model risk
    Kellner, Ralf
    Roesch, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2016, 68 : 45 - 63