Intercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling clouds and radiation for SHEBA in May 1998

被引:48
|
作者
Inoue, Jun
Liu, Jiping
Pinto, James O.
Curry, Judith A.
机构
[1] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, JAMSTEC, IORGC, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 2370061, Japan
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Aerosp Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JCLI3854.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
To improve simulations of the Arctic climate and to quantify climate model errors, four regional climate models [ the Arctic Regional Climate System Model (ARCSYM), the Coupled Ocean - Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS), the High-Resolution Limited-Area Model (HIRHAM), and the Rossby Center Atmospheric Model (RCA)] have simulated the annual Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) under the Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ARCMIP). The same lateral boundary and ocean surface boundary conditions (i.e., ice concentration and surface temperature) drive all of the models. This study evaluated modeled surface heat fluxes and cloud fields during May 1998, a month that included the onset of the surface icemelt. In general, observations agreed with simulated surface pressure and near-surface air properties. Simulation errors due to surface fluxes and cloud effects biased the net simulated surface heat flux, which in turn affected the timing of the simulated icemelt. Modeled cloud geometry and precipitation suggest that the RCA model produced the most accurate cloud scheme, followed by the HIRHAM model. Evaluation of a relationship between cloud water paths and radiation showed that a radiative transfer scheme in ARCSYM was closely matched with the observation when liquid clouds were dominant. Clouds and radiation are of course closely linked, and an additional comparison of the radiative transfer codes for ARCSYM and COAMPS was performed for clear-sky conditions, thereby excluding cloud effects. Overall, the schemes for radiative transfer in ARCSYM and for cloud microphysics in RCA potentially have some advantages for modeling the springtime Arctic.
引用
收藏
页码:4167 / 4178
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling Performance of SCALE-AMPS: Simulations of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Observed During SHEBA
    Ong, Chia Rui
    Koike, Makoto
    Hashino, Tempei
    Miura, Hiroaki
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [22] Antarctic clouds and radiation within the NCAR climate models
    Hines, KM
    Bromwich, DH
    Rasch, PJ
    Iacono, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (06) : 1198 - 1212
  • [23] THE INFLUENCE OF CLOUDS ON RADIATION - A CLIMATE-MODELING PERSPECTIVE
    FOUQUART, Y
    BURIEZ, JC
    HERMAN, M
    KANDEL, RS
    REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1990, 28 (02) : 145 - 166
  • [24] Cyclone Activity in the Arctic From an Ensemble of Regional Climate Models (Arctic CORDEX)
    Akperov, Mirseid
    Rinke, Annette
    Mokhov, Igor I.
    Matthes, Heidrun
    Semenov, Vladimir A.
    Adakudlu, Muralidhar
    Cassano, John
    Christensen, Jens H.
    Dembitskaya, Mariya A.
    Dethloff, Klaus
    Fettweis, Xavier
    Glisan, Justin
    Gutjahr, Oliver
    Heinemann, Guenther
    Koenigk, Torben
    Koldunov, Nikolay V.
    Laprise, Rene
    Mottram, Ruth
    Nikiema, Oumarou
    Scinocca, John F.
    Sein, Dmitry
    Sobolowski, Stefan
    Winger, Katja
    Zhang, Wenxin
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2018, 123 (05) : 2537 - 2554
  • [25] The features of modeling of radiation forcing on the climate in the Arctic region
    Sushkevich, T. A.
    Strelkov, S. A.
    Maksakova, S. V.
    22ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEAN OPTICS: ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2016, 10035
  • [26] Global climate models intercomparison of anthropogenic aerosols effects on regional climate over north Pacific
    Hu, JiaXi
    Zhang, Renyi
    Pan, Bowen
    Lin, Yun
    Wang, Yuan
    Ming, Yi
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252
  • [27] An overview of microphysical properties of Arctic clouds observed in May and July 1998 during FIRE ACE
    Lawson, RP
    Baker, BA
    Schmitt, CG
    Jensen, TL
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D14) : 14989 - 15014
  • [28] Modeling snow-cover heterogeneity over complex arctic terrain for regional and global climate models
    Déry, SJ
    Crow, WT
    Stieglitz, M
    Wood, EF
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2004, 5 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [29] Global and regional modeling of clouds and aerosols in the marine boundary layer during VOCALS: the VOCA intercomparison
    Wyant, M. C.
    Bretherton, C. S.
    Wood, R.
    Carmichael, G. R.
    Clarke, A.
    Fast, J.
    George, R.
    Gustafson, W. I., Jr.
    Hannay, C.
    Lauer, A.
    Lin, Y.
    Morcrette, J-J
    Mulcahy, J.
    Saide, P. E.
    Spak, S. N.
    Yang, Q.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 15 (01) : 153 - 172
  • [30] Polar clouds and radiation in satellite observations, reanalyses, and climate models
    Lenaerts, Jan T. M.
    Van Tricht, Kristof
    Lhermitte, Stef
    L'Ecuyer, Tristan S.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (07) : 3355 - 3364