Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

被引:18
|
作者
Elayan, Mohammed M. [1 ]
Horowitz, Justin G. [1 ,2 ]
Magraner, Jose M. [1 ]
Shaughnessy, Paul J. [1 ,3 ]
Bachier, Carlos [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Transplant Inst, Adult Blood & Marrow Transplant, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Pharm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Sarah Cannon Blood Canc Network, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Biosimilar; Tbo-filgrastim; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Mobilization; Engraftment; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; BIOSIMILAR G-CSF; PLUS G-CSF; PERIPHERAL-BLOOD; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; MARROW-TRANSPLANTATION; MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; NORMAL DONORS; LUNG-CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There are limited data available supporting the use of the recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), tbo-filgrastim, rather than traditionally used filgrastim to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or to accelerate engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We sought to compare the efficacy and cost of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in these settings. Patients diagnosed with lymphoma or plasma cell disorders undergoing G-CSF mobilization, with or without plerixafor, were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome was total collected CD34(+) cells/kg. Secondary mobilization endpoints included peripheral CD34(+) cells/mu L on days 4 and 5 of mobilization, adjunctive use of plerixafor, CD34(+) cells/Kg collected on day 5, number of collection days and volumes processed, number of collections reaching 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg, and percent reaching target collection goal in 1 day. Secondary engraftment endpoints included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, number of blood product transfusions required before engraftment, events of febrile neutropenia, and length of stay. A total of 185 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients receiving filgrastim (n = 86) collected a median of 5.56 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, compared with a median of 5.85 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the tbo-filgrastim group (n = 99; P = .58). There were no statistically significant differences in all secondary endpoints with the exception of apheresis volumes processed (tbo-filgrastim, 17.0 liters versus filgrastim, 19.7 liters; P < .01) and mean platelet transfusions (tbo-filgrastim, 1.7 units versus filgrastim, 1.4 units; P =. 04). In conclusion, tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34(+) yield compared with filgrastim in mobilization and post-transplantation settings, with no clinically meaningful differences in secondary efficacy and safety endpoints. Furthermore, tbo-filgrastim utilization was associated with cost savings of approximately $1406 per patient utilizing average wholesale price. (C) 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:1921 / 1925
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experiences of autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation with "biosimilar" filgrastim (Zarzio®, Sandoz, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor)
    Gopcsa, L.
    Remenyi, P.
    Adamkovich, N.
    Barta, A.
    Batai, A.
    Farkas, Z.
    Borbenyi, Z.
    Csukly, Z.
    Dogas, J.
    Bodo, I.
    Fabian, J.
    Goda, V.
    Kiraly, A.
    Lengyel, L.
    Lovas, N.
    Marton, I.
    Matrai, Z.
    Mikala, G.
    Modok, S.
    Peto, M.
    Piukovics, K.
    Rasonyi, R.
    Reti, M.
    Sipos, A.
    Szoke, A.
    Torbagyi, E.
    Masszi, T.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 : S114 - S115
  • [32] Fixed dose of pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplantation
    Marcacci, G
    Petti, MC
    Ferrara, F
    Scarpato, N
    Storti, S
    D'Arena, G
    Palombi, F
    Palmieri, S
    Andretta, C
    Pinto, A
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 37 : S160 - S160
  • [33] PEG-filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplantation
    De Rosa, G.
    Montante, B.
    Becchimanzi, C.
    De Rosa, A.
    Cacciapuoti, C.
    Rotoli, B.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 92 : 230 - 230
  • [34] Comparison of the effectiveness of hematopoietic cell mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim versus filgrastim alone for autologous transplant in patients with lymphoma
    Homero Gutierrez-Aguirre, Cesar
    De la Garza-Salazar, Fernando
    Cantu-Rodriguez, Olga
    Gonzalez-Llano, Oscar
    Jaime-Perez, Jose C.
    Mancias-Guerra, Consuelo
    Garcia-Sepulveda, Ricardo
    Salazar-Riojas, Rosario
    Gomez-Almaguer, David
    GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO, 2016, 152 : 57 - 65
  • [35] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FILGRASTIM, BIOSIMILAR FILGRASTIM AND LENOGRASTIM AS PERIPHERAL BLOOD CD34+MOBILIZATION DRUG FOR AUTOLOGOUS HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
    Soria, B.
    Ubierna, P.
    Rodriguez-Lopez, J.
    Iglesias, A.
    Mesa, J.
    Gonzalez-Perera, I.
    Gonzalez-de-la-Fuente, G.
    Hernandez-Garcia, M. T.
    Raya, J. M.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2015, 100 : 793 - 794
  • [36] Peg-Filgrastim Versus Filgrastim In Prevention Of Febrile Neutropenia In Lymphoma Patients After Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
    Radic-Kristo, D.
    Zatezalo, V.
    Jakobac, K. Misura
    Simec, N. Gredelj
    Jurenec, S.
    Pavic, N.
    Rogulj, I. Mandac
    Martinovic, M.
    Peraica, A. Planinc
    Kolonic, S. Ostojic
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 50 : S196 - S197
  • [37] USE OF BIOSIMILAR FILGRASTIM FOR PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL MOBILIZATION IN AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY
    Gerivaz, R.
    Schuh, J.
    Costa, F.
    Ferreira, G.
    Botelho de Sousa, A.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 49 : S220 - S220
  • [38] Filgrastim alone versus chemotherapy plus filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.
    Donato, ML
    Chu, DT
    Alexanian, R
    Weber, DM
    Korbling, MJ
    Giralt, SA
    Champlin, RE
    BLOOD, 2000, 96 (11) : 182A - 182A
  • [39] Randomized trial of autologous filgrastim-primed bone marrow transplantation versus filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients
    Gyger, M
    Sahovic, E
    Aslam, M
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (09) : 3489 - 3489
  • [40] Randomized trial of autologous filgrastim-primed bone marrow transplantation versus filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients
    Damiani, D
    Fanin, R
    Silvestri, F
    Grimaz, S
    Infanti, L
    Geromin, A
    Cerno, M
    Michieli, M
    Rinaldi, C
    Savignano, C
    Trani, G
    Fiacchini, M
    Baccarani, M
    BLOOD, 1997, 90 (01) : 36 - 42