Biomechanical and clinical implications of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery

被引：18
|
作者：
Meyer, U [1 ]
Kleinheinz, J [1 ]
Joos, U [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Cranio Maxillofacial Surg, D-48149 Munich, Germany
来源：
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY | 2004年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词：
distraction osteogenesis; biomechanics; mechanical strain;
D O I：
10.1016/j.jcms.2003.12.003
中图分类号：
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号：
1003 ;
摘要：
Introduction: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis is an established surgical procedure to correct bony malformations. Force transduction through the osteotomized bone fragments elicits defined biological responses in the gap tissue, which determines the clinical success of the distraction treatment. Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate clinically a new distraction protocol based on an analysis of the biological and biomechanical parameters executing direct effects on bone regeneration during distraction. Study design: A multistep distraction protocol was used in 39 patients and the clinical outcome was monitored postoperatively. Results: All the distraction cases were successful with a single exception. Segmental displacements were stable clinically and radiologically. Conclusion: In order to improve the clinical success of distraction osteogenesis, individual treatment protocols are recommended. (C) 2003 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码：140 / 149
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
    Hopper, Richard A.
    Ettinger, Russell E.
    Purnell, Chad A.
    Dover, M. Stephen
    Pereira, Alberto Rocha
    Tuncbilek, Gokhan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (06) : 1073E - 1088E
  • [22] Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
    Gu, Luosha
    Wang, Pu
    Du, Qingyan
    Zhang, Zewei
    An, Yang
    Li, Guangshuai
    Liu, Linbo
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (05) : 892E - 893E
  • [23] Potentials and limitations of distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial skeleton
    Klein, C
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1999, : 281 - 289
  • [24] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases
    Mofid, M
    Manson, P
    Robertson, B
    Tufaro, A
    Elias, J
    Kolk, CV
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 9, 2001, : 169 - 172
  • [25] Is Distraction Osteogenesis of the Irradiated Craniofacial Skeleton Contraindicated?
    Momeni, Arash
    Januszyk, Michael
    Wan, Derrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (05) : 1236 - 1241
  • [26] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: A review of 3278 cases
    Mofid, MM
    Manson, PN
    Robertson, BC
    Tufaro, AP
    Elias, JJ
    Vander Kolk, CA
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (05) : 1103 - 1114
  • [27] YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis
    Coban, Gokhan
    Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : 2005 - 2007
  • [28] Rabbits as a model for research into craniofacial distraction osteogenesis
    Diasim, U. M.
    Hekking-Weijma, J. M.
    Wolvius, E. B.
    van Neck, J. W.
    van der Wal, K. G. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 46 (08): : 620 - 624
  • [29] Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies
    Swennen, G
    Schliephake, H
    Dempf, R
    Schierle, H
    Malevez, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (02) : 89 - 103
  • [30] Reply: Thirty Years Later: What Has Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis Surgery Replaced?
    Hopper, Richard A.
    Susarla, Srinivas M.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (05) : 893E - 895E
12345