Robot-Assisted Upper and Lower Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke Walking and Arm/Hand Function

被引:52
|
作者
Hesse, Stefan
Mehrholz, Jan [2 ,3 ]
Werner, Cordula [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Klin Berlin, Abt Neurol Rehabil, D-14089 Berlin, Germany
[2] Klin Bavaria Kreischa, Abt Fruhrehabil, Bavaria, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Bereich Publ Hlth Gesundheitswissensch, Dresden, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2008年 / 105卷 / 18期
关键词
stroke; hemiparesis; rehabilitation; robotics; physiotherapy;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2008.0330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Robots help to intensify motor rehabilitation of the upper and lower limbs after stroke. This article presents controlled studies relating to this topic, and an overview. Methods: A search was carried out for relevant randomized controlled trials, published between 1980 and 2007, on Medline (PubMed), Embase, and CINHAL. Results: Two studies showed benefit for an electromechanical gait trainer, with significantly more patients resuming walking as compared to conventional physiotherapy. Two studies showed no evidence of benefit for an exoskeleton-based system. A pooled analysis was not conducted due to the small numbers of studies and high heterogeneity. In arm/hand rehabilitation a number of unilateral or bilateral end-effector based systems proved effective in patients with stroke, and a simple one-dimensional system and a passive exoskeleton system proved effective in patients with chronic symptoms. Discussion: Robot-assisted motor rehabilitation after stroke appears promising. More trials, including comparative studies, are mandatory. The robot cannot be considered a substitute for the patient-therapist relationship.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:330 / 336
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients
    Mazzoleni, S.
    Crecchi, R.
    Posteraro, F.
    Carrozza, M. C.
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 886 - 889
  • [2] Assessment of movement quality in robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review
    Nordin, Nurdiana
    Xie, Sheng Quan
    Wuensche, Burkhard
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 11
  • [3] Effects of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation on Hand Function of People With Stroke
    Asirvatham, Thajus
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2023, 77 (03):
  • [4] Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients
    Yoo, Doo Han
    Kim, Se Yun
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2015, 27 (03) : 677 - 679
  • [5] Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function
    Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
    Klein, Julius
    Burdet, Etienne
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2010, 23 (06) : 661 - 670
  • [6] Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function after stroke: Development of prediction models for reference to therapy
    Baldan, Francesca
    Turolla, Andrea
    Rimini, Daniele
    Pregnolato, Giorgia
    Maistrello, Lorenza
    Agostini, Michela
    Jakob, Iris
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2021, 57
  • [7] Evolution of upper limb kinematics four years after subacute robot-assisted rehabilitation in stroke patients
    Pila, Ophelie
    Duret, Christophe
    Gracies, Jean-Michel
    Francisco, Gerard E.
    Bayle, Nicolas
    Hutin, Emilie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 128 (11) : 1030 - 1039
  • [8] Predicting Clinically Significant Improvement After Robot-Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Subacute and Chronic Stroke
    Lee, Jae Joon
    Shin, Joon-Ho
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [9] Feasibility and Usability of a Robot-Assisted Complex Upper and Lower Limb Rehabilitation System in Patients with Stroke: A Pilot Study
    Kim, Kyoung Tae
    Choi, Yongmin
    Cho, Jang Hyuk
    Lee, Soyoung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2023, 47 (02): : 108 - 117
  • [10] Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Platform
    Malosio, Matteo
    Pedrocchi, Nicola
    Tosatti, Lorenzo Molinari
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI 2010), 2010, : 115 - 116