Is extraordinary prosocial behavior more valuable than ordinary prosocial behavior?

被引:8
|
作者
Futamura, Ikumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Educ & Human Dev, Chikusa Ku, Furo Cho, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
COMPETENCE; MORALITY; SOCIABILITY; COOPERATION; ALTRUISM; KINDNESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0196340
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study examined how people evaluate ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors, especially their predictions of the likelihood of future prosocial behaviors of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial actors (Study 1). Further, it examined the individual effects of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors of an actor on the evaluation of his/her trait by considering the cases where the actor engages in and does not engage in the other behavior (Study 2). Study 1 revealed that the likelihood of future prosocial behaviors of ordinary and extraordinary prosocial actors was perceived asymmetrically. Specifically, while the likelihood of ordinary prosocial actors to engage in ordinary prosocial behaviors was perceived as high, the same perception was not observed for extraordinary prosocial behaviors. On the other hand, extraordinary prosocial actors were perceived as highly likely to engage in both ordinary and extraordinary prosocial behaviors. Study 2 revealed that the evaluation of actors who engaged in extraordinary prosocial behaviors but not ordinary prosocial behaviors did not exceed the evaluation of actors who engaged in ordinary prosocial behaviors but not extraordinary prosocial behaviors. Additionally, the effect of extraordinary prosocial behaviors was more when the actor also engaged in ordinary prosocial behaviors. These results suggest that extraordinary prosocial actors are evaluated highly when they also engage in ordinary prosocial behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Empathy, gender, and prosocial behavior
    Kamas, Linda
    Preston, Anne
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 92
  • [32] Becoming prosocial: The consistency of individual differences in early prosocial behavior
    Schachner, Abby C. W.
    Newton, Emily K.
    Thompson, Ross A.
    Goodman-Wilson, Miranda
    EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2018, 43 : 42 - 51
  • [33] AN EVOLUTIONARY PARADOX FOR PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR
    Forber, Patrick
    Smead, Rory
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 111 (03): : 151 - 166
  • [34] Prosocial behavior:: A comprehensive view
    Molero, C
    Candela, C
    Cortés, MT
    REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 1999, 31 (02): : 325 - 353
  • [35] Sugar promotes prosocial behavior
    不详
    SUGAR INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 148 (05): : 259 - 259
  • [36] Answering the call for prosocial behavior
    Christensen, C
    Fierst, D
    Jodocy, A
    Lorenz, DN
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 138 (05): : 564 - 571
  • [37] DETERMINANTS OF PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR DEVELOPMENT
    PALENIK, L
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1993, 35 (4-5) : 387 - 389
  • [38] INDIVIDUAL ORIENTATIONS TO PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR
    GERGEN, KJ
    GERGEN, MM
    METER, K
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1973, 28 (03) : 105 - 130
  • [39] The Motivation of Prosocial Behavior of Adolescents
    Kyrychenko, Valentyna
    Petrochko, Zhanna
    Necherda, Valeriia
    Yezhova, Olha
    Denysiuk, Olena
    BRAIN-BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 13 (01): : 308 - 323
  • [40] PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN ENVY SCENARIOS
    Li, Xiujun
    Su, Yuhui
    Liu, Xiaoshi
    Shi, Wendian
    Shi, Kan
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2017, 45 (11): : 1803 - 1814