Suppression of deflagration flame propagation of methane-air in tube by argon gas and explosion-eliminating chamber

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Quan [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Chang, Weida [4 ]
Li, Zhimin [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Li, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[2] Engn Lab Explos Mat & Technol Anhui Prov, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
[4] Northeastern Univ, Fire & Explos Protect Lab, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FLAMMABILITY LIMITS; MIXTURES; FORMULA; VESSEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-022-09086-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To explore the inhibitory effect of argon gas and explosion-eliminating chamber on methane-air deflagration flame propagation in the tube, based on the phi = 120 mm, L = 5.5 m stainless steel pipeline test system to measure methane-air deflagration flame structure, flame propagation speed, and deflagration pressure. The results show that: 10-30% argon is mixed into the methane-air premixed gas with different equivalent ratios. With the increase in the mixed argon content, the tensile distortion and instability of the flame front increase, and the average value of flame propagation speed decreases by 2.52-60.0%. The first and second deflagration pressure peaks are reduced by about 13.1-62% and 17.7-86.5% respectively. The average value of the methane-air deflagration flame propagation velocity was reduced by 5.7-37.0% with the explosion-eliminating chamber laid at the nozzle. The second and third deflagration pressure peaks are reduced by about 10-30% and 50-90% respectively. The inhibitory effect of argon on the propagation of methane-air flame is considered better than the laying of the explosion-eliminating chamber under the experimental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF TRANSPORT PROCESSES ON PROPAGATION OF A METHANE-AIR FLAME
    SHEBEKO, YN
    KOROLCHENKO, AY
    BARATOV, AN
    SHAMONIN, VG
    COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 1988, 24 (05) : 578 - 581
  • [22] Propagation of turbulent flame of methane-air mixtures in tubes
    Tunik, Yu.V.
    2000, Izdatel'stvo SO RAN (36):
  • [23] Simulations of flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transitions in methane-air systems
    Kessler, D. A.
    Gamezo, V. N.
    Oran, E. S.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2010, 157 (11) : 2063 - 2077
  • [24] Numerical simulation of methane-air explosion flame in a long closed vessel
    Bi, Ming-Shu
    Dong, Cheng-Jie
    Zhou, Yi-Hui
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2012, 37 (01): : 127 - 131
  • [25] Numerical simulation of premixed methane-air deflagration in a semi-confined obstructed chamber
    Xu, Chaoyi
    Cong, Lixin
    Yu, Zhe
    Song, Zhanbing
    Bi, Mingshu
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2015, 34 : 218 - 224
  • [26] On the mechanisms of flame propagation in methane-air mixtures with concentration gradient
    Sun, Xuxu
    Lu, Shouxiang
    ENERGY, 2020, 202 (202)
  • [27] DYNAMICS OF FLAME PROPAGATION THROUGH LAYERED METHANE-AIR MIXTURES
    LIEBMAN, I
    CORRY, J
    PERLEE, HE
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1971, 2 (5-6) : 365 - &
  • [28] Effects of obstacle angle on methane-air deflagration characteristics in a semi-confined chamber
    Wen, Xiaoping
    Ding, Haoqing
    Su, Tengfei
    Wang, Fahui
    Deng, Haoxin
    Zheng, Kai
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 45 : 210 - 216
  • [29] EFFECTS OF ELECTRIC-FIELDS ON THE FLAME PROPAGATION VELOCITY OF METHANE-AIR FLAME
    NOORANI, RI
    HOLMES, RE
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1986, 24 (01) : 190 - 192
  • [30] Influence of concentration gradient on methane-air explosion propagation: An experimental study
    Wang, Haiyan
    Xu, Zuohui
    Tang, Simin
    Chen, Xiao
    Liu, Zhenqian
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2025, 47 (01) : 6108 - 6119