共 50 条
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during and after STEMI: a single-centre, methodological study comparing estimated and measured GFR
被引:6
|作者:
Venetsanos, Dimitrios
[1
]
Alfredsson, Joakim
[1
]
Segelmark, Marten
[1
]
Swahn, Eva
[1
]
Lawesson, Sofia Sederholm
[1
]
机构:
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Div Cardiovasc Med, Linkoping, Sweden
来源:
关键词:
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES;
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE;
RENAL-DISEASE;
CYSTATIN-C;
COCKCROFT-GAULT;
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES;
PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE;
ST-ELEVATION;
CKD-EPI;
D O I:
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007835
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objectives: To validate the performance of the most commonly used formulas for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) against measured GFR during the index hospitalisation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Setting: Single centre, methodological study. Participants: 40 patients with percutaneous coronary intervention-treated STEMI were included between November 2011 and February 2013. Patients on dialysis, cardiogenic shock or known allergy to iodine were excluded. Outcome measures: Creatinine and cystatin C were determined at admission and before discharge in 40 patients with STEMI. Clearance of iohexol was measured (mGFR) before discharge. We evaluated and compared the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-IDMS), the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) and the Grubb relative cystatin C (rG-CystC) with GFR regarding correlation, bias, precision and accuracy (P30). Agreement between eGFR and mGFR to discriminate CKD was assessed by Cohen's. statistics. Results: MDRD-IDMS and CKD-EPI demonstrated good performance to estimate GFR (correlation 0.78 vs 0.81%, bias -1.3% vs 1.5%, precision 17.9 vs 17.1 mL/min 1.73 m(2) and P30 82.5% vs 82.5% for MDRD-IDMS vs CKD-EPI). CKD was best classified by CKD-EPI (. 0.83). CG showed the worst performance (correlation 0.73%, bias -1% to 3%, precision 22.5 mL/min 1.73 m(2) and P30 75%). The rG-CystC formula had a marked bias of -17.8% and significantly underestimated mGFR (p=0.03). At arrival, CKD-EPI and rG-CystC had almost perfect agreement in CKD classification (kappa=0.87), whereas at discharge agreement was substantially lower (kappa=0.59) and showed a significant discrepancy in CKD classification (p=0.02). Median cystatin C concentration increased by 19%. Conclusions: In acute STEMI, CKD-EPI showed the best CKD-classification ability followed by MDRD-IDMS, whereas CG performed the worst. STEMI altered the performance of the cystatin C equation during the acute phase, suggesting that other factors might be involved in the rise of cystatin C.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文