Survival of airborne microorganisms during swirling aerosol collection

被引:122
|
作者
Lin, XJ [1 ]
Reponen, T [1 ]
Willeke, K [1 ]
Wang, Z [1 ]
Grinshpun, SA [1 ]
Trunov, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Environm Hlth, Aerosol Res & Exposure Assessment Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/027868200303722
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An earlier study evaluated the physical performance of the Swirling Aerosol Collector, also known as the "BioSampler," and found it to have several advantages over the widely used AGI-30 impinger when tested with inert test particles. The present study was Focused on the physical and biological performance with laboratory-aerosolized microorganisms. The results showed that the BioSampler has better physical collection efficiency for B. subtilis and P. fluororescens than the AGI-30 when water was used as the collection fluid and the sampling how rate ranged from 8.5 L min (- 1) to the standard 12.5 L min (- 1) Additionally, the BioSampler provided equivalent or better microbial recovery for the 2 species than the AGI-30 did. The swirling motion of the collection liquid in the BioSampler generates very few bubbles and therefore causes minimal reentrainment of already collected microorganisms. In contrast to the AGI-30, the BioSampler can be used very effectively with nonevaporating liquids, such as mineral oil or glycerol. Mineral oil was found to be a suitable collection fluid for culture analysis, whereas glycerol can be used only for nonculture assays, such as the polymerase chain reaction. By using a more viscous, nonevaporating fluid, the BioSampler can be used for long-term sampling of low airborne bacterial concentrations, while the AGI-30 impinger, filled with a standard evaporating fluid, can only be used for up to about 30 min.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 196
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrical charges on airborne microorganisms
    Mainelis, G
    Willeke, K
    Baron, P
    Reponen, T
    Grinshpun, SA
    Górny, RL
    Trakumas, S
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2001, 32 (09) : 1087 - 1110
  • [42] SURVIVAL AND STABILITY OF MICROORGANISMS DURING FREEZE-DRYING
    MALIK, KA
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 1988, 25 (06) : 517 - 518
  • [43] Exposure to microorganisms during waste collection - A comparative study of a new versus a conventional collection system
    Wurtz, H
    Nielsen, M
    Nielsen, BH
    Breum, NO
    Midtgard, U
    Poulsen, OM
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 1997, 57 (05): : 206 - 206
  • [44] Los Angeles Basin airborne organic aerosol characterization during CalNex
    Craven, J. S.
    Metcalf, A. R.
    Bahreini, R.
    Middlebrook, A.
    Hayes, P. L.
    Duong, H. T.
    Sorooshian, A.
    Jimenez, J. L.
    Flagan, R. C.
    Seinfeld, J. H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (19) : 11453 - 11467
  • [45] AIRBORNE LIDAR AEROSOL MEASUREMENTS DURING ASSESS-II MISSION
    WERNER, C
    BACHSTEIN, F
    DIETZ, S
    HERRMANN, H
    KOPP, F
    LOFFLER, H
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1978, 49 (07): : 974 - 981
  • [46] COLLECTION OF AIRBORNE DUSTS
    BOTTERILL, JS
    AYNSLEY, E
    BRITISH CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1967, 12 (10): : 1593 - +
  • [47] Comparison of aerosol measurement systems during the 2016 airborne ARISTO campaign
    Ortega, John
    Snider, Jefferson R.
    Smith, James N.
    Reeves, J. Michael
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (08) : 871 - 885
  • [48] Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during processing of valerian roots on farms
    Skórska, C
    Sitkowska, J
    Krysinska-Traczyk, E
    Cholewa, G
    Dutkiewiez, J
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (01) : 119 - 126
  • [49] A SEMIAUTOMATIC AIRBORNE AEROSOL SAMPLER
    SEMONIN, RG
    MCCRADY, RE
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGY, 1961, 18 (05): : 677 - 681
  • [50] Exposure to airborne microorganisms in polish sawmills
    Dutkiewicz, J
    Krysinska-Traczyk, E
    Prazmo, Z
    Skórska, C
    Sitkowska, J
    ANNALS OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (01) : 71 - 80