Accurate and efficient amino acid analysis for protein quantification using hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry

被引:63
|
作者
Kambhampati, Shrikaar [1 ]
Li, Jia [1 ]
Evans, Bradley S. [1 ]
Allen, Doug K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Donald Danforth Plant Sci Ctr, St Louis, MO 63132 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, St Louis, MO USA
基金
美国农业部; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
HILIC; Chromatography; Isobaric compounds; Amino acids; Protein hydrolysis; Protein quantification; LC-MS; MS; Soybeans; Isotopes; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; RAPID QUANTIFICATION; MS/MS ASSAY; HYDROLYSIS; QUANTITATION; IDENTIFICATION; METHIONINE; EXTRACTION; TRYPTOPHAN; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13007-019-0430-z
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
BackgroundMethods used to quantify protein from biological samples are often inaccurate with significant variability that requires care to minimize. The errors result from losses during protein preparation and purification and false detection of interfering compounds or elements. Amino acid analysis (AAA) involves a series of chromatographic techniques that can be used to measure protein levels, avoiding some difficulties and providing specific compositional information. However, unstable derivatives, that are toxic and can be costly, incomplete reactions, inadequate chromatographic separations, and the lack of a single hydrolysis method with sufficient recovery of all amino acids hinder precise protein quantitation using AAA.ResultsIn this study, a hydrophilic interaction chromatography based method was used to separate all proteinogenic amino acids, including isobaric compounds leucine and isoleucine, prior to detection by multiple reaction monitoring with LC-MS/MS. Through inclusion of commercially available isotopically labeled (C-13, N-15) amino acids as internal standards we adapted an isotopic dilution strategy for amino acid-based quantification of proteins. Three hydrolysis methods were tested with ubiquitin, bovine serum albumin, (BSA), and a soy protein biological reference material (SRM 3234; NIST) resulting in protein estimates that were 86-103%, 82-94%, and 90-99% accurate for the three protein samples respectively. The methane sulfonic acid hydrolysis approach provided the best recovery of labile amino acids including: cysteine, methionine and tryptophan that are challenging to accurately quantify.ConclusionsAccurate determination of protein quantity and amino acid composition in heterogeneous biological samples is non-trivial. Recent advances in chromatographic phases and LC-MS/MS based methods, along with the availability of isotopic standards can minimize difficulties in analysis and improve protein quantitation. A robust method is described for high-throughput protein quantification and amino acid compositional analysis. Since accurate measurement of protein quality and quantity are a requirement for many biological studies that relate to crop improvement or more generally, our understanding of metabolism in living systems, we envision this method will have broad applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accurate and efficient amino acid analysis for protein quantification using hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry
    Shrikaar Kambhampati
    Jia Li
    Bradley S. Evans
    Doug K. Allen
    [J]. Plant Methods, 15
  • [2] Application of amino acid analysis using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry for peptide and protein quantification
    Kato, Megumi
    Kato, Hisashi
    Eyama, Sakae
    Takatsu, Akiko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 877 (27): : 3059 - 3064
  • [3] Quantification of plasma homocitrulline using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
    Jaisson, Stephane
    Gorisse, Laetitia
    Pietrement, Christine
    Gillery, Philippe
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 402 (04) : 1635 - 1641
  • [4] Quantification of plasma homocitrulline using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
    Stéphane Jaisson
    Laëtitia Gorisse
    Christine Pietrement
    Philippe Gillery
    [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012, 402 : 1635 - 1641
  • [5] Fast quantification of endogenous carbohydrates in plasma using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry
    Zhu, Bangjie
    Liu, Feng
    Li, Xituo
    Wang, Yan
    Gu, Xue
    Dai, Jieyu
    Wang, Guiming
    Cheng, Yu
    Yan, Chao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2015, 38 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [6] Rapid quantification of underivatized amino acids in plasma by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled with tandem mass-spectrometry
    Prinsen, Hubertus C. M. T.
    Schiebergen-Bronkhorst, B. G. M.
    Roeleveld, M. W.
    Jans, J. J. M.
    de Sain-van der Velden, M. G. M.
    Visser, G.
    van Hasselt, P. M.
    Verhoeven-Duif, N. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE, 2016, 39 (05) : 651 - 660
  • [7] Amino acid analysis by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled on-line to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
    T. Langrock
    P. Czihal
    R. Hoffmann
    [J]. Amino Acids, 2006, 30 : 291 - 297
  • [8] Amino acid analysis by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled on-line to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
    Langrock, T
    Czihal, P
    Hoffmann, R
    [J]. AMINO ACIDS, 2006, 30 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [9] A hydrophilic interaction chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for amino acid profiling in mussels
    Tsochatzis, Emmanouil D.
    Begou, Olga
    Gika, Helen G.
    Karayannakidis, Panayotis
    Kalogiannis, Stavros
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 1047 : 197 - 206
  • [10] Analysis of chlormequat and mepiquat by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry in food samples
    Esparza, X.
    Moyano, E.
    Galceran, M. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (20) : 4402 - 4406