A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index to Kannada Language and Evaluation of Its Validity and Reliability
    Mohan, Venkatdeep
    Prashanth, G. S.
    Meravanigi, Gururaja
    Rajagopalan, N.
    Yerramshetty, Janardhan
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (11) : E674 - E680
  • [32] Internal Consistency and Test-Retest Reliability of the Jenkins Sleep Scale Across International Versions: A Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis
    Jahrami, Haitham
    Trabelsi, Khaled
    Ghazzawi, Hadeel
    Ammar, Achraf
    Pandi-Perumal, Seithikurippu R.
    Saif, Zahra
    Vitiello, Michael V.
    CURRENT SLEEP MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 10 (02) : 289 - 300
  • [33] Action (verb) fluency: Test-retest reliability, normative standards, and construct validity
    Woods, SP
    Scott, JC
    Sires, DA
    Grant, I
    Heaton, RK
    Troster, AI
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 11 (04) : 408 - 415
  • [34] Integrated testing of standing balance and cognition: Test-retest reliability and construct validity
    Szturm, Tony
    Sakhalkar, Vedant
    Boreskie, Sue
    Marotta, Jonathan J.
    Wu, Christine
    Kanitkar, Anuprita
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (01) : 146 - 152
  • [35] Development, Test-Retest Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Resistance Training Skills Battery
    Lubans, David R.
    Smith, Jordan J.
    Harries, Simon K.
    Barnett, Lisa M.
    Faigenbaum, Avery D.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (05) : 1373 - 1380
  • [36] Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Task
    Lange, Florian
    Dewitte, Siegfried
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 73
  • [37] Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Automated Vehicle User Perception Survey
    Mason, Justin
    Classen, Sherrilene
    Wersal, James
    Sisiopiku, Virginia
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [38] Test-retest variability and internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index
    Barsties, B.
    Maryn, Y.
    HNO, 2013, 61 (05) : 399 - 403
  • [39] Preliminary Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of iPad-Adapted Neuropsychological Measures
    Babakhanyan, I
    Sakamoto, M.
    Severson, J.
    Hendrix, T.
    Cosman, J.
    Merickel, M.
    McShea, K.
    O'Carroll, V
    Marcotte, T.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 30 (06) : 596 - 596
  • [40] Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability
    Kaili Clackson
    Nadya Pohran
    Riccardo M. Galli
    Laura Labno
    Miguel Farias
    Tristan A. Bekinschtein
    Valdas Noreika
    Behavior Research Methods, 2022, 54 : 457 - 474