A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency

被引:53
|
作者
Sheahan, Peter J. [1 ]
Nelson-Wong, Erika J. [2 ]
Fischer, Steven L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, 28 Div St, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Regis Univ, Rueckert Hartman Coll Hlth Profess, Sch Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
关键词
Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test-retest reliability; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.7340.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.9370.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.8760.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed.Implications for RehabilitationLow back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer.The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients.An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts.This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies
    Bernd A. G. Fellinghauer
    Andrea Roth
    Katinka Bugari
    Jan D. Reinhardt
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2011, 23 : 257 - 265
  • [2] Construct Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Internal Consistency of the Photo Elicitation Semantic Differential Scale (PESD) in Disability Studies
    Fellinghauer, Bernd A. G.
    Roth, Andrea
    Bugari, Katinka
    Reinhardt, Jan D.
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2011, 23 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [3] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY, INTERNAL CONSISTENCY, AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE FARSI VERSION OF THE OXFORD HAPPINESS INVENTORY
    Bayani, Ali Asghar
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2008, 103 (01) : 139 - 144
  • [4] Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the adapted Arabic version of the Oxford shoulder score in patients with shoulder disorders
    Alsanawi, Hisham Abdulaziz
    Alghadir, Ahmad H.
    Anwer, Shahnawaz
    Alenazi, Hind Abdulsalam
    Li, Heng
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (19) : 2790 - 2796
  • [5] The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: Test-retest reliability and construct validity
    Goolkasian, P
    Wheeler, AH
    Gretz, SS
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2002, 18 (04): : 245 - 250
  • [6] Analysis of Test-Retest Reliability, Construct Validity, and Internal Consistency of the Brazilian Version of the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire
    Simoes, Luan
    Teixeira-Salmela, Luci Fuscaldi
    Magalhaes, Livia
    Stuge, Britt
    Laurentino, Gloria
    Wanderley, Elaine
    Barros, Raphaela
    Lemos, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 41 (05) : 425 - 433
  • [7] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI): Structural Validity, Construct Validity, Internal Consistency, and Test-retest Reliability
    Modarresi, Shirin
    Farzad, Maryam
    Shafiee, Erfan
    Modarresi, Golale
    Maleki, Mahshad
    Bakhshi, Enayatollah
    Hosseini, Seyed Ali
    Walton, David Mark
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2023, 11 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [8] Long term test-retest reliability of Oswestry Disability Index in male office workers
    Irmak, Rafet
    Baltaci, Gul
    Ergun, Nevin
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2016, 53 (03): : 639 - 642
  • [9] Cambridge Psycholinguistic Inventory of Christian Beliefs: A registered report of construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability
    Clackson, Kaili
    Pohran, Nadya
    Galli, Riccardo M.
    Labno, Laura
    Farias, Miguel
    Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
    Noreika, Valdas
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 54 (01) : 457 - 474
  • [10] Validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Montenegrin 10-item Voice Handicap Index
    Zvrko, Elvir
    Kadic, Muhedin
    ARHIV ZA HIGIJENU RADA I TOKSIKOLOGIJU-ARCHIVES OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 73 (02): : 143 - 147