Environmental impact and cost assessment of a novel lignin production method

被引:33
|
作者
Yadav, Pooja [1 ]
Athanassiadis, Dimitris [1 ]
Antonopoulou, Io [2 ]
Rova, Ulrika [2 ]
Christakopoulos, Paul [2 ]
Tysklind, Mats [3 ]
Matsakas, Leonidas [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Biomat & Technol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, Div Chem Engn, Biochem Proc Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Chem, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Bark; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Lignin; Renewable biofuel; Tannin; STEAM EXPLOSION PRETREATMENT; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; HYBRID ORGANOSOLV; FRACTIONATION; HYDROLYSIS; BIOMASS; BIRCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123515
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The oil scarcity and the rise in earth temperature have elevated the interest in lignocellulosic biorefineries. Lignin has high potential to be used in various applications including the production of biomaterials and transportation fuels. Among the different sources of lignin, organosolv lignin has the advantage of being sulphur-free and of low ash content compared to other types of industrial lignin. The present study focuses on cradle-to-gate life cycle and cost assessment of a novel organosolv lignin production process from spruce bark. The system boundary included production of tannin, lignin from spruce bark and handling of waste including all the inputs (material and energy) and outputs (emissions) in the process. Baseline scenario and scenarios S1 and S2 were compared to identify the most environmentally and economically suitable scenario. The baseline scenario is lignin production with co-production of tannin and tannin free bark (TFB) from spruce bark; scenario S1 is lignin production from TFB; and scenario S2 is lignin production from TFB with mass allocation. The functional unit was 1 kg lignin produced and ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used for the environmental impact assessment. The results showed that the baseline scenario had higher global warming potential (GWP) (2.14 kg CO(2)eq.) and total cost (1.959 (sic)/kg) than S1 (1.39 kg CO2 eq. and 1.377 (sic)/kg respectively) and S2 (0.23 kg CO(2)eq. and 0.998 (sic)/kg respectively) scenarios. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that the use of bioethanol instead of ethanol reduced the burden on GWP but increased the burden on the land use impact category. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED BIOCHAR AND BIOENERGY PRODUCTION
    Fryda, Lydia
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Visser, Rianne
    PAPERS OF THE 26TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2018, : 1311 - 1319
  • [22] Environmental Impact Assessment of Electricity Production from Lignite
    Nanaki, Evanthia A.
    Koroneos, Christopher J.
    Xydis, George A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 35 (06) : 1868 - 1875
  • [23] Cleaner Production and Environmental Impact Assessment: A UK perspective
    Salvador, N.N.B.
    Glasson, J.
    Piper, J.M.
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000, 8 (02) : 127 - 132
  • [24] COMPARATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CORRUGATED BOARD PRODUCTION
    Iosip, Alina
    Hortal, Mercedes
    Dobon, Antonio
    Bobu, Elena
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 9 (09): : 1281 - 1287
  • [25] Environmental Impact of Waste Treatment and Synchronous Hydrogen Production: Based on Life Cycle Assessment Method
    Luo, Yiting
    Su, Rongkui
    TOXICS, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [26] A Novel Offsite Construction Method for Social Housing in Emerging Economies for Low Cost and Reduced Environmental Impact
    Tapia, Danilo
    Gonzalez, Marcelo
    Vera, Sergio
    Aguilar, Carlos
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [27] Cost versus life cycle assessment-based environmental impact optimization of drinking water production plants
    Capitanescu, F.
    Rege, S.
    Marvuglia, A.
    Benetto, E.
    Ahmadi, A.
    Gutierrez, T. Navarrete
    Tiruta-Barna, L.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 177 : 278 - 287
  • [28] Environmental impact assessment with rapid impact assessment matrix method: during disaster conditions
    Abbasi, Sina
    Modibbo, Umar Muhammad
    Kolashlou, Hamed Jafari
    Ali, Irfan
    Kavousi, Nader
    FRONTIERS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2024, 10
  • [29] A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment
    Toro, Javier
    Requena, Ignacio
    Duarte, Oscar
    Zamorano, Montserrat
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 43 : 9 - 20
  • [30] Environmental Impact Assessment Method of Photovoltaic Power Station
    Li Chunlai
    Sun Yuejia
    Gu Dake
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICSCSE), 2016, : 41 - 43