Subjective well-being among the oldest old: The role of personality traits

被引:22
|
作者
Etxeberria, Igone [1 ]
Etxebarria, Itziar [2 ]
Urdaneta, Elena [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Fac Psychol, Dept Personal Assessment & Psychol Treatments, Avda Tolosa 70, San Sebastian 20018, Guipuzcoa, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Fac Psychol, Basic Psychol Proc & Its Dev, Avda Tolosa 70, San Sebastian 20018, Guipuzcoa, Spain
[3] Euskampus, Cooperat Innovat, Ed Rectorado Barrio Sarriena S-N, Leioa 48940, Bizkaia, Spain
关键词
Oldest old; Personality; Subjective well-being; LIFE SATISFACTION; NEGATIVE AFFECT; HEALTH; AGE; CENTENARIANS; LONELINESS; ADULTS; VIEWS; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.042
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Very little work has been carried out to identify the determinants of subjective well-being among the oldest old. The aim of this study was to analyze whether individual characteristics (i.e. functional capacity, physical and perceived health, cognition and personality) and social resources (i.e. perceived social support) predict subjective well-being (SWB) among this age group. Participants were 102 community-dwelling healthy older adults aged between 85 and 104 (M = 92.53; SD = 5.91). The sample group consisted of only those not in a state of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) dependence who were not suffering from either mood disorders or cognitive impairment associated with neurode-generative disease. Personality traits (conscientiousness, extraversion and openness) emerged as the strongest predictors of positive affect. Neuroticism and perceived mental health were found to predict negative affect, whereas neuroticism and extraversion emerged as the strongest predictors of life satisfaction. Subjective well-being among the oldest old was mainly predicted by personality traits. Functional capacity, physical health, cognition and social support were not found to be influential factors of subjective well-being. These findings suggest that researchers and clinicians should consider the relationship between personality and subjective well-being among the oldest old.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Personality dimensions and subjective well-being
    Chico Libran, Eliseo
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 9 (01): : 38 - 44
  • [22] The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being
    DeNeve, KM
    Cooper, H
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (02) : 197 - 229
  • [23] Happy as an extraverted clam? The role of personality for subjective well-being
    DeNeve, KM
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (05) : 141 - 144
  • [24] Personality and subjective well-being: One neglected model of personality and two forgotten aspects of subjective well-being
    Jovanovic, Veljko
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (05) : 631 - 635
  • [25] Health and well-being in the young old and oldest old
    Smith, J
    Borchelt, M
    Maier, H
    Jopp, D
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2002, 58 (04) : 715 - 732
  • [26] Trajectories of Multiple Subjective Well-Being Facets Across Old Age: The Role of Health and Personality
    Potter, Sophie
    Drewelies, Johanna
    Wagner, Jenny
    Duezel, Sandra
    Brose, Annette
    Demuth, Ilja
    Steinhagen-Thiessen, Elisabeth
    Lindenberger, Ulman
    Wagner, Gert G.
    Gerstorf, Denis
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2020, 35 (06) : 894 - 909
  • [27] Understanding Well-being in the Oldest Old.
    George, Linda K.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 (06): : 871 - 875
  • [28] Individual values and well-being: The moderating role of personality traits
    Bojanowska, Agnieszka
    Urbanska, Beata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 56 (05) : 698 - 709
  • [29] The impact of frailty on the oldest old well-being
    Keciour, MG
    d'Elinay, CL
    Spini, D
    Bickel, J
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 140 - 141
  • [30] Online Networks and Subjective Well-Being: The Effect of "Big Five Personality Traits"
    Requena, Felix
    Ayuso, Luis
    SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2021, 9 (04) : 399 - 412